Grisby v. Wilberforce University
Plaintiff: Clayton D Grisby
Defendant: Wilberforce University
Case Number: 3:2010cv00184
Filed: May 11, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
Office: Dayton Office
County: GREENE
Presiding Judge: Thomas M Rose
Nature of Suit: Labor: Other
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 2617 Family and Medical Leave Act
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 16, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 64 JUDGMENT with attached Notice of Disposal. Signed on 10/16/12. (pb1)
April 3, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 52 NOTICE: The Clerk of Court is directed to note in the record that: 1. Referral of this case to the undersigned Judicial Officer has expired; and 2. No Motion or other matter in this case remains pending before the undersigned Judicial Officer. Signed by Magistrate Judge Sharon L Ovington on 4/3/12. (cib1)
August 2, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 45 DECISION AND ENTRY - It is therefore ORDERED that: 1. The Report and Recommendations filed on July 15, 2011 (Doc. # 39 ) is ADOPTED in full; and2. Defendants Motion for Partial Judgment on the Pleadings (Doc. # 33 ) is DENIED as Moot. Signed by Judge Thomas M Rose on 08/02/11. (pb1)
December 17, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 21 ENTRY AND ORDER OVERRULING GRISBY'S OBJECTIONS (Doc. # 19 ) TO THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS; ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS (Doc. # 18 ) IN ITS ENTIRETY; OVERRULING GRISBY'S MOTION FOR A PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION (Doc. 9 ); OVERRULING GRISBY'S MOTION TO EXECUTE AMENDED COMPLAINT (Doc. # 13 ); GRANTING DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR A MORE DEFINITE STATEMENT (Doc.# 12 ) AND ORDERING GRISBY TO FILE A SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT THAT COMPLIES WITH FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 8(a), 9(b) and 10(b) WITHIN THIRTY (30) DAYS OF ENTRY OF THIS ORDER. Signed by Judge Thomas M Rose on 12/17/10. (bac1)
November 15, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 18 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - IT IS THEREFORE RECOMMENDED THAT: 1. Defendants Motion for More Definite Statement (Doc. # 12 ) be GRANTED; 2. Plaintiff be directed to file a Second Amended Complaint complying with Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a), 9(b), and 10 (b); 3. Plaintiffs Preliminary Injunction Motion (Doc. # 9 ) be DENIED; and 4. Plaintiffs Motion to Execute Amended Complaint, Uncontested Preliminary Injunction Motion and Certification of Uncontested Motion Claims (Doc. # 13 ) be DENIED. Objections to R&R due by 12/2/2010. Signed by Magistrate Judge Sharon L Ovington on 11/15/10. (pb1)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Grisby v. Wilberforce University
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Clayton D Grisby
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Wilberforce University
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?