Cordell v. Doe McKinny
| Phillip Cordell |
| John Doe McKinny |
| 3:2010cv00212 |
| June 2, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Dayton Office |
| GREENE |
| Thomas M Rose |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
40
DECISION AND ORDER - All discovery herein is stayed until a decision on Defendant's impending motion to dismiss, which must be filed by March 1, 2011. Plaintiff's "Motion for Discovery and Motion for a Stay for Want and the Issuance o f a Subpoena" (Doc. No. 38) is denied without prejudice to its renewal after the discovery stay has been lifted. No subpoena will be issued at this time. However, Defendant's counsel shall give notice to the appropriate Greene County offici al in the nature of a litigation hold to maintain all evidence, including electronic evidence, relevant to this case for purposes of eventual discovery. Regarding Plaintiff's renewed request for appointment of counsel, as Plaintiff has been told before (1) no attorney can be compelled to take the case without being paid and (2) Congress has not appropriated any money for such a payment. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R Merz on 2/8/2011. (kpf1)
|
|
Filing
36
SUPPLEMENTAL MEMORANDUM on Plaintiff's Objections (Doc. No. 35) to the Magistrate Judge's Decision and Order of January 17, 2011, which denied leave to file an amended complaint adding Greene County Sheriff Gene Fisher as a defendant (Doc. No. 28). Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R Merz on 1/20/2011. (kpf1)
|
|
Filing
34
DECISION AND ORDER; SUPPLEMENTAL MEMORANDUM OPINION - Plaintiff's Motion for Change of Venue 29 is denied; Plaintiff's Motion for Discovery (Doc. No. 31) is stricken for lack of signature; and Defendant's Motion to stay all discovery is granted pending ruling on Defendant's impending motion to dismiss. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R Merz on 1/13/2011. (kpf1)
|
|
Filing
20
NOTICE TO PLAINTIFF - This case is before the Court on correspondence to the Clerk from Plaintiff dated September 10, 2010. Plaintiff advises that his Amended Complaint (Doc. No. 14) was filed for the purpose of adding The Greene County Jail and The Greene County Sheriff's Office as defendants. Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 15, a plaintiff is entitled to file an amended complaint once before any answer is filed without the Courts permission; on that basis, the Amended Complaint was accepted. Howeve r, adding parties requires court permission which must be sought by a separate motion. The case is now stayed pending review by the Volunteer Lawyers Project. Once the stay is vacated, Plaintiff is free to move to add additional parties. However, Pla intiff is advised that the Greene County Jail and the Greene County Sheriff's Office are not suable entities under Ohio law. Rather, the proper party defendant for those two institutions would be the Greene County Sheriff in his official capacity. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R Merz on 9/18/2010. (kpf1)
|
|
Filing
13
ORDER UPON INITIAL SCREENING - The Clerk is ordered to issue process and deliver same to the United States Marshal for service pursuant to the Court's general order in that regard. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R Merz on 6/29/2010. (kpf1)
|
|
Filing
6
DECISION AND ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL WITHOUT PREJUDICE AND GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO SUBMIT A REDUCED NUMBER OF COPIES. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R Merz on 6/8/2010. (kpf1)
|
|
Filing
5
ORDER TO SUPPLEMENT MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS - Plaintiff has not completed the standard form for proceeding in forma pauperis in a PLRA case. Therefore, it is hereby ORDERED the Clerk furnish Plaintiff with the standard form application and that he return it as soon as possible with the required certificate. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R Merz on 6/7/2010. (kpf1)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Cordell v. Doe McKinny | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Phillip Cordell | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: John Doe McKinny | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
