McCline v. Warden, Southern Ohio Correctional Facility
Petitioner: James McCline
Respondent: Warden, Southern Ohio Correctional Facility
Case Number: 3:2010cv00232
Filed: June 16, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
Office: Dayton Office
County: CHAMPAIGN
Presiding Judge: Walter H Rice
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 14, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 17 DECISION AND ENTRY: (1) ADOPTING 14 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS and 16 Supplemental REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS; (2) OVERRULING 15 Objections; (3) DISMISSING 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus; (4) DENYING any requested certificate of appealability and leave to appeal in forma pauperis; and (5) TERMINATING this case. Signed by Judge Timothy S. Black on 1/14/11. (mr1) (Additional attachment(s) added on 1/14/2011: # 2 Certified Mail Receipt DN 17 and 18 sent) (mr1).
January 4, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 16 SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - This habeas corpus case is before the Court on Petitioner's Objections (Doc. No. 15) to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendations (Doc. No. 14). Because the Objections do not state any basis for rejecting the Report and Recommendations, it is again respectfully recommended that the Petition be dismissed with prejudice. Objections to R&R due by 1/21/2011. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R Merz on 1/4/2011. (kpf1)
December 23, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 14 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 10 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Warden, Southern Ohio Correctional Facility, 5 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by James M Cline, 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus Objections to R&R due by 1/10/2011. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R Merz on 12/23/2010. (mrm0)
June 17, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER TO FILE AMENDED PETITION AND APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS; ORDER TO CLERK TO AMEND CAPTION - Upon initial review, the Magistrate Judge finds several anomalies which require correction. 1. The Clerk has docketed this case in the name of "James McCline." Petitioner's true name is "James M. Cline." The Clerk is ordered to amend the docket accordingly. 2. It is accordingly ordered that the Clerk furnish Petitioner with the proper form for filing under 28 U. S.C. § 2254 and that Petitioner file an Amended Petition on that form immediately. 3. Petitioner did not pay the filing fee of $5.00 nor file an application to proceed in forma pauperis. He shall pay the fee or file such an application with his Amended Petition. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R Merz on 6/17/2010. (kpf1)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: McCline v. Warden, Southern Ohio Correctional Facility
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: James McCline
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Warden, Southern Ohio Correctional Facility
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?