West v. Hilton et al
Andrea West |
Bradley Hilton, Drive Logistics, LTD, CIT Financial, LTD, GTA Trailer Rental, Diamond Cab Company and Isaac Ajak |
3:2010cv00284 |
July 19, 2010 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
Dayton Office |
MONTGOMERY |
Timothy S. Black |
Motor Vehicle |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 99 CLERK'S JUDGMENT AFFIRMING DECISION AND ENTRY 98 . (mr1) |
Filing 93 ORDER STRIKING PLAINTIFF'S FILINGS (DOCS. 90, 91) - Plaintiff SHALL comply with the Courts standing order on or before December 7, 2012, by filing Plaintiff's Response to Proposed Undisputed Facts. Should Plaintiff fail to fully com ply with the Court's standing order on or before December 7, 2012, the Court may accept Defendants' Proposed Undisputed Facts (Doc. 88 ) as admitted for purposes of summary judgment. Defendants' Reply Memorandum, if any, shall be filed by December 21, 2012. Signed by Judge Timothy S. Black on 12/5/2012. (mr1) |
Filing 55 ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS' MOTIONS FOR LEAVE TO SERVE ADDITIONAL INTERROGATORIES (DOCS. 48 , 47 ). Signed by Judge Timothy S. Black on 4/9/12. (mr1) |
Filing 52 ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS' MOTIONS TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE OF SERVICE OF PROCESS AND LACK OF PERSON JURISDICTION (DOC. 37 ). Signed by Judge Timothy S. Black on 3/30/12. (mr1) |
Filing 51 ORDER: (1) DENYING DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE (DOC. 41 ); (2) SETTING AN ACCELERATED BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON DEFENDANTS' SECOND MOTION TO COMPEL (DOC. 47 ); AND (3) HOLDING PLAINTIFF'S MOTIONS FOR LEAVE TO SERVE ADDITIONAL INTERROGATORIES (DOCS 48 , 49 ) IN ABEYANCE PENDING DISPOSITION OF DEFENDANTS' SECOND MOTION TO COMPEL. Signed by Judge Timothy S. Black on 3/30/12. (mr1) |
Filing 38 ORDER AND ENTRY: (1) GRANTING DEFENDANTS' RENEWED MOTION TO COMPEL; (2) STAYING A DETERMINATION OF DEFENDANTS' ALTERNATIVE REQUEST TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE; AND (3) GRANTING DEFENDANTS' REQUEST FOR LEAVE TO MOVE FOR ATTORNEY FEES AND COSTS (DOC. 36 ). Signed by Judge Timothy S. Black on 1/24/12. (mr1) |
Filing 35 ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO DEEM CHRIS CAMPER AND CARL L. COLLINS, III TO BE PLAINTIFFS TRIAL ATTORNEYS (DOC. 33). Signed by Judge Timothy S. Black on 1/20/12. (mr1) |
Filing 25 ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND COMPLAINT (DOC 23) AND STRIKING IT FROM THE RECORD. The attorneys for Plaintiff are ORDERED to familiarize themselves with the Local Rules and CM/ECF filing procedures of this Court. Plaintif f may file another motion seeking to amend the Complaint provided such motion is filed on or before AUGUST 24, 2011. Further, any motion seeking to amend the pleadings to add Issac Ajak and/or Diamond Cab must comply with all applicable rules and address the Court's aforementioned concerns. Signed by Judge Timothy S. Black on 8/16/11. (mr1) |
Filing 20 ORDER (1) DISMISSING PLAINTIFF'S 2 COMPLAINT AGAINST ISSAC AJAK AND DIAMOND CAB COMPANY WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR FAILURE OF SERVICE; AND (2) DIRECTING DEFENDANTS BRADLEY HILTON, DRIVE LOGISTICS, LTD, CIT FINANCIAL, LTD AND GTA TRAILER RENTAL TO SERVE CROSS-CLAIMS WITHIN FIFTEEN DAYS. Signed by Judge Timothy S. Black on 7/14/11. (mr1) |
Filing 19 ORDER ON THE COURT'S SECOND ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE AND NOTICE TO PLAINTIFF OF THE COURT'S INTENT TO DISMISS DEFENDANT'S ISSAC AJAK AND DIAMOND CAB COMPANY ABSENT PROPER SERVICE AND PROOF OF SERVICE WITHIN THIRTY DAYS. Signed by Judge Timothy S. Black on 6/6/11. (mr1) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.