Peter Li, Inc. v. Bayard, Inc.
| Peter Li, Inc. |
| Bayard, Inc. |
| 3:2010cv00308 |
| July 30, 2010 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Dayton Office |
| MONTGOMERY |
| Timothy S. Black |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1114 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
17
DECISION AND ENTRY (NUNC PRO TUNC 8/3/2010) OVERRULING PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER 4 ; CAPTIONED CAUSE REFERRED TO JUDGE TIMOTHY S. BLACK ON WHOSE DOCKET THIS CASE RESIDES. Signed by Judge Walter H Rice on 9/20/10. (sc1)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Peter Li, Inc. v. Bayard, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Peter Li, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Brandon McGrath |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Bayard, Inc. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
