Adams v. Warden, Lebanon Corretional Institution

Justia Dockets & Filings Sixth Circuit Ohio Southern District Adams v. Warden, Lebanon Corretional Institution

Adams v. Warden, Lebanon Corretional Institution

Petitioner:	Charles E. Adams
Respondent:	Warden, Lebanon Correctional Institution
Case Number:	3:2010cv00315
Filed:	August 11, 2010
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
Office:	Dayton Office
County:	MONTGOMERY
Presiding Judge:	Sharon L Ovington
Presiding Judge:	Walter H Rice
Nature of Suit:	General
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
October 10, 2012	Filing 17 JUDGMENT with Attached Notice of Disposal. Signed on 10/10/12. (pb1)
April 10, 2012	Filing 12 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. It is respectfully RECOMMENDED that Petitioner's §2254 petition for a writ of habeas corpus be DISMISSED with prejudice and this case be TERMINATED on the Court's docket. Reasonable jurists would not disagre e with the recommended disposition on Ground One. Therefore, if Petitioner seeks to appeal, the Court RECOMMENDS that he be DENIED a certificate of appealability on Ground One. It is possible, however, that reasonable jurists would disagree with the recommended disposition on Ground Two. Therefore, if Petitioner seeks to appeal, the Court RECOMMENDS that Petitioner be GRANTED a certificate of appealability on Ground Two and leave to proceed informa pauperis on appeal. Objections to R&R due by 4/27/2012. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J Newman on 4/10/2012. (mdf1)

Date Filed

Document Text

October 10, 2012

Filing 17 JUDGMENT with Attached Notice of Disposal. Signed on 10/10/12. (pb1)

April 10, 2012

Filing 12 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. It is respectfully RECOMMENDED that Petitioner's §2254 petition for a writ of habeas corpus be DISMISSED with prejudice and this case be TERMINATED on the Court's docket. Reasonable jurists would not disagre e with the recommended disposition on Ground One. Therefore, if Petitioner seeks to appeal, the Court RECOMMENDS that he be DENIED a certificate of appealability on Ground One. It is possible, however, that reasonable jurists would disagree with the recommended disposition on Ground Two. Therefore, if Petitioner seeks to appeal, the Court RECOMMENDS that Petitioner be GRANTED a certificate of appealability on Ground Two and leave to proceed informa pauperis on appeal. Objections to R&R due by 4/27/2012. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J Newman on 4/10/2012. (mdf1)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Adams v. Warden, Lebanon Corretional Institution
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Charles E. Adams
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: Warden, Lebanon Correctional Institution
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?