Karns v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Douglas A Karns |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| 3:2010cv00318 |
| August 12, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Dayton Office |
| CLARK |
| Sharon L Ovington |
| Thomas M Rose |
| Disability Insurance |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
25
DECISION AND ENTRY granting 23 Motion for Attorney Fees pursuant to 42 U.S.C. Section 406(b), the Commissioner shall pay Plaintiff's attorney fees pursuant to 42 U.S.C. Section 406(b)(1) in the amount of $3,603.45. Signed by Judge Thomas M Rose on 4-2-2014. (de)
|
|
Filing
21
DECISION AND ENTRY - It is hereby ORDERED that: 1. The Report and Recommendations filed on April 9, 2012 (Doc. 20 ) is ADOPTED in full. 2. Plaintiff's Application For Attorney Fees Under Equal Access To Justice Act,28 U.S.C. 2412(d) (Doc. 17 ) is GRANTED in the amount of $4,885.75. 3. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter Judgment in favor of Plaintiff andagainst the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration in the totalamount of $4,885.75. 4. The case remains terminated on the docket of this Court. Signed by Judge Thomas M Rose on 4/27/12. (kje1)
|
|
Filing
20
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - IT IS THEREFORE RECOMMENDED THAT: 1. Plaintiff's Application For Attorney Fees Under Equal Access To Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. 2412(d) (Doc. 17 ) be GRANTED in the amount of $4,885.75. 2. The Clerk of Court be directed to enter Judgment in favor of Plaintiff and against the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration in the total amount of $4,885.75. 3. The case remains terminated on the docket of this Court. Objections to R&R due by 4/26/2012. Signed by Magistrate Judge Sharon L Ovington on 4/9/12. (kje1)
|
|
Filing
14
DECISION AND ENTRY - It is therefore ORDERED that: 1. The Report and Recommendations filed on July 21, 2011 (Doc. # 13 ) is ADOPTED in full; 2. The Commissioners final decision that Plaintiff is not under a "disability" as defined by the So cial Security Act is VACATED. 3. No finding is made regarding whether Plaintiff is under a "disability" as defined by the Social Security Act; 4. This matter is REMANDED to the Social Security Administration pursuant to Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for further proceedings consistent with this Decision and Entry and the Report and Recommendations; and 5. This case is terminated on the docket of this Court. Signed by Judge Thomas M Rose on 08/10/11. (pb1)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Karns v. Commissioner of Social Security | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Douglas A Karns | |
| Represented By: | Carla J Lauer |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security | |
| Represented By: | John J Stark |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
