Lemaster v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration

Justia Dockets & Filings Sixth Circuit Ohio Southern District Lemaster v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration

Lemaster v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration

Plaintiff:	Connie Lemaster
Defendant:	Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Case Number:	3:2011cv00010
Filed:	January 12, 2011
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
Office:	Dayton Office
County:	MONTGOMERY
Presiding Judge:	Michael R Merz
Presiding Judge:	Thomas M Rose
Nature of Suit:	Supplemental Security Income
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 405
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
April 3, 2012	Filing 20 ORDER - On Stipulation of the parties (Doc. No. 18 ), it is hereby ordered that Plaintiff be, and she hereby is, awarded attorney fees in the amount of $3,400.00 under the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412, payable to the Plaintiff until and unless it is determined that Plaintiff has no outstanding debts to the United States, in which case the award will be made payable to Plaintiff's trial attorney herein. Signed by Judge Thomas M Rose on 04/03/12. (pb1)
January 4, 2012	Filing 17 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that, pursuant to the fourth sentence of 42 U.S.C. Section 405(g), the Commissioners decision that Plaintiff is not disabled is REVERSED and the matter is REMANDED to the Commissioner for additional administrative proceedings. This matter is hereby terminated on the Courts docket. Signed by Judge Thomas M Rose on 0/4/12. (pb1)

Date Filed

Document Text

April 3, 2012

Filing 20 ORDER - On Stipulation of the parties (Doc. No. 18 ), it is hereby ordered that Plaintiff be, and she hereby is, awarded attorney fees in the amount of $3,400.00 under the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412, payable to the Plaintiff until and unless it is determined that Plaintiff has no outstanding debts to the United States, in which case the award will be made payable to Plaintiff's trial attorney herein. Signed by Judge Thomas M Rose on 04/03/12. (pb1)

January 4, 2012

Filing 17 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that, pursuant to the fourth sentence of 42 U.S.C. Section 405(g), the Commissioners decision that Plaintiff is not disabled is REVERSED and the matter is REMANDED to the Commissioner for additional administrative proceedings. This matter is hereby terminated on the Courts docket. Signed by Judge Thomas M Rose on 0/4/12. (pb1)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Lemaster v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Connie Lemaster
Represented By:	Gary Marc Blumenthal
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Represented By:	Henry S. Kramzyk
Represented By:	John J Stark
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?