Johnson et al v. Harrison Township Sheriff's Dept
| Floyd S Johnson |
| Northland Village Apts and Harrison Township Sheriff's Department |
| 3:2011cv00078 |
| March 15, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Dayton Office |
| MONTGOMERY |
| Michael R Merz |
| Walter H Rice |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
55
JUDGMENT with Notice of Disposal in favor of Harrison Township Sheriff's Department, Northland Village Apts against Floyd S Johnson. Case Terminated. Signed on 2/21/2013. (kf)
|
|
Filing
51
ORDER TO PRO SE PLAINTIFF UPON FILING OF MOTION TO DISMISS OR MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 50 filed by Harrison Township Sheriff's Department. Under the rules of this Court (S.D. Ohio L.R. 7.2) you are allowed twenty-one daysfrom the date of service (January 24, 2013) within which to file a response to this motion, plus an extra three days because of the way the motion was sent to you. Your response must be filed with the Court not later than February 19, 2013.Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R Merz on 01/24/2013. (kf)
|
|
Filing
47
DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS 40 . Northland Village's Motion to Dismiss is granted and the Amended Complaint as to that Defendant is dismissed without prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. This is not a final appealable order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R Merz on 12/9/2011. (kje1)
|
|
Filing
35
DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE (DOC. # 22 ) IN THEIR ENTIRETY; PLAINTIFF'S OBJECTIONS TO SAID JUDICIAL FILING (DOC. # 25 ) OVERRULED; CLAIMS ONE AND THREE OF PLAINTIFF'S PRO SE COMPLAINT DISMISSED; CLAIM ONE WITH PREJUDICE, CLAIM THREE WITHOUT PREJUDICE; COURT NOTES THAT SERVICE HAS BEEN MADE ON DEFENDANTS. Signed by Judge Walter H Rice on 9/30/2011. (mdf1)
|
|
Filing
24
ORDER DENYING RE-SCREENING FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL AND STAY PENDING RELEASE FROM PRISON - This case is before the Court on Plaintiff's Motion for re-screening of his Complaint for possible appointment of counsel (Doc. No. 23). Because the VL P screening process is the sole process the Court has for screening these cases, the Court declines to create or attempt to create a new process just for Plaintiff's case. The Motion for re-screening is denied. The Court likewise denies Plaintiff's request to stay proceedings pending his release in September, 2011. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R Merz on 7/18/2011. (kpf1)
|
|
Filing
19
ORDER STRIKING MOTION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R Merz on 4/19/2011. (kpf1)
|
|
Filing
17
ORDER - Plaintiffs' Supplemental Memorandum Supporting Complaint (Doc. No. 14), Plaintiffs' Request for Disclosures and Discovery Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26, and Plaintiffs' Request for Production of Documents (Doc. No. 16) are str icken. Mr. Johnson has now been advised several times about not filing documents on behalf of the others Plaintiffs and is now ORDERED not to do so in the future. He is cautioned that violating this Order is subject to punishment as contempt of cour t. Neither Joanne Marie Johnson nor Tamika Trapps has filed the endorsement required to become a party to this case and April 15, 2011, was the deadline set by the Court for filing the endorsements. Accordingly, the Magistrate Judge will proceed to analyze the Complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915 only as to claims made by Mr. Johnson on his own behalf. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R Merz on 4/15/2011. (kpf1)
|
|
Filing
11
ENTRY REGARDING PARTICIPATION AS PLAINTIFFS OF JOANNE JOHNSON AND TAMIKA TRAPPS - At the request of Plaintiff Floyd Johnson (Doc. No. 7), the Magistrate Judge contacted JoAnne Johnson by telephone on March 28, 2011. She confirmed that she is the spou se of Floyd Johnson and the mother of Tamika Trapps, and that she resides at 4016 Myron Avenue as shown on the docket. In order to protect the rights of Ms. Johnson and Ms. Trapps, it is hereby ORDERED: 1. The Clerk shall send two copies of all prior filings in this case to Ms. Johnson and Ms. Trapps (in care of Ms. Johnson). 2. Not later than April 15, 2011, Ms. Johnson and Ms. Trapps shall each sign and file with the Court the enclosed document entitled "Endorsement" if they wish to be included as plaintiffs in this case. (Either Ms. Johnson or Ms. Trapps may sign without the other, but neither of them will be included without signing.) Ms. Johnson and Ms. Trapps, as well as Plaintiff Floyd Johnson, are hereby notified that non e of them is permitted to sign on behalf of any of the others because in federal court you can only sign on behalf of someone else if you are an attorney at law. Therefore all future filings on behalf of any particular plaintiff will have to be signed by that plaintiff personally. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R Merz on 3/28/2011. (kpf1)
|
|
Filing
2
ORDER - Plaintiffs must do several things before the case can proceed. In addition, the Clerk is ordered to issue no process in this case pending further order of the Court. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R Merz on 3/16/2011. (kpf1)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
