Wenglor Sensors, Ltd. v. Baur et al
Plaintiff: Wenglor Sensors, Ltd.
Defendant: Dieter Baur and Barbara Baur
Case Number: 3:2011cv00159
Filed: May 12, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
Office: Dayton Office
County: CLARK
Presiding Judge: Thomas M Rose
Nature of Suit: P.I.: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 20, 2012. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 20, 2012 Opinion or Order NOTATION ORDER granting #18 Motion for Extension of Time. Signed by Judge Thomas M Rose on 4-20-2012. (de)
April 19, 2012 Filing 18 MOTION for Extension of Time New date requested 5/21/2012. to File Notice of Appeal by Plaintiff Wenglor Sensors, Ltd.. (Hahn, Peter)
March 22, 2012 Filing 17 JUDGMENT - Notice of Disposal attached. Case Terminated. Signed on 3/22/12. (kje1) (kje1).
March 22, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ENTRY AND ORDER GRANTING DIETER BAUR'S AND BARBARA BAUR'S MOTION TO DISMISS FOR LACK OF PERSONAL JURISDICTION (Doc. #11 ). Signed by Judge Thomas M Rose on 3/22/12. (kje1)
February 27, 2012 Filing 15 REPLY to Response to Motion re #11 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction filed by Defendants Barbara Baur, Dieter Baur. (Parker, John)
February 10, 2012 Filing 14 RESPONSE in Opposition re #11 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction filed by Plaintiff Wenglor Sensors, Ltd.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A -- Portions of Transcript, #2 Exhibit B -- Notice of Dismissal of State Court Action) (Hahn, Peter)
February 3, 2012 Filing 13 NOTICE of Appearance by John D Parker for Defendants Barbara Baur, Dieter Baur (Parker, John)
January 18, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ENTRY AND ORDER FINDING DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS THE ORIGINAL COMPLAINT (Doc. #7 ) MOOT. Signed by Judge Thomas M Rose on 1/18/12. (pb1)
January 18, 2012 Notice of Correction re: #10 MOTION to Substitute Attorney John Parker and Lora Reece. Pursuant to L.R 83, Document is Struck per TMR Chambers, Document was filed as a Motion as it was presented to the court as a NOTICE. COUNSEL NOTIFIED (pb1)
January 17, 2012 Filing 11 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction by Defendants Barbara Baur, Dieter Baur. Responses due by 2/10/2012 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A (Reece Decl.), #2 Exhibit B (Greene Cty. Compl.), #3 Exhibit C (D. Baur Aff.), #4 Exhibit D. (B. Baur Aff.), #5 Exhibit E (R. Baur Aff.), #6 Exhibit F (F. Baur Aff.), #7 Exhibit G (Mag. Report), #8 Exhibit H (Judgment)) (Parker, John)
January 17, 2012 Filing 10 ...STRICKEN PER TMR CHAMBERS. Pursuant to L.R. 83, Document incorrectly submitted, Counsel Notified... MOTION to Substitute Attorney John Parker and Lora Reece by Defendants Barbara Baur, Dieter Baur. (Parker, John) Modified on 1/18/2012 (pb1).
December 30, 2011 Filing 9 RESPONSE in Opposition re #7 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction filed by Plaintiff Wenglor Sensors, Ltd.. (Hahn, Peter)
December 30, 2011 Filing 8 AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Wenglor Sensors, Ltd.. (Hahn, Peter)
December 9, 2011 Filing 7 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction by Defendants Barbara Baur, Dieter Baur. Responses due by 1/3/2012 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Reece Declaration, #2 Exhibit B - Ohio SOS Filing, #3 Exhibit C - Greene Cty. Complaint, #4 Exhibit D - D. Baur Affidavit, #5 Exhibit E - B. Baur Affidavit, #6 Exhibit F - R. Baur Affidavit, #7 Exhibit G - F. Baur Affidavit, #8 Exhibit H - Magistrate Report, #9 Exhibit I - Order Adopting Report) (Williams, Jeffrey)
November 2, 2011 Filing 6 RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Plaintiff Wenglor Sensors, Ltd.. (Hahn, Peter)
October 21, 2011 Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Barbara Baur, Dieter Baur. (sr)
October 19, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Signed by Judge Thomas M Rose on 10/19/11. (ep)
May 18, 2011 ...NOTICE, If case is to be referred, it will be Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz (pb1)
May 12, 2011 Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Plaintiff Wenglor Sensors, Ltd.. (Hahn, Peter)
May 12, 2011 Filing 2 NOTICE by Plaintiff Wenglor Sensors, Ltd. of Filing of Civl Cover Sheet (Hahn, Peter)
May 12, 2011 Filing 1 COMPLAINT with JURY DEMAND against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 350 paid - receipt number: 0648-3148126), filed by Wenglor Sensors, Ltd.. (Hahn, Peter)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Wenglor Sensors, Ltd. v. Baur et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Wenglor Sensors, Ltd.
Represented By: Nicole M Loucks
Represented By: Peter W. Hahn
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Dieter Baur
Represented By: Jeffrey Taylor Williams
Represented By: John D Parker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Barbara Baur
Represented By: Jeffrey Taylor Williams
Represented By: John D Parker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?