Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Oliver et al
| Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. |
| William S. Oliver, Kathleen D. Forrest and South Beach Investments LLC |
| 3:2011cv00235 |
| July 6, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Dayton Office |
| MONTGOMERY |
| Walter H Rice |
| Cable/Satellite TV |
| 47 U.S.C. ยง 553 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
33
DECISION AND ENTRY SUSTAINING PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL OF STATE LAW CONVERSION CLAIM (Doc. 31 ); DISMISSING CONVERSION CLAIM WITHOUT PREJUDICE; JUDGMENT TO ENTER IN FAVOR OF PLAINTIFF AND AGAINST DEFENDANTS WILLIAM S. OLIVER AND SOUTH BEACH INVESTMENTS, LLC IN THE AMOUNT OF $28,475.00; TERMINATION ENTRY. Signed by Judge Walter H Rice on 2/25/13. (kje1)
|
|
Filing
30
DECISION AND ENTRY OVERRULING IN PART AND SUSTAINING IN PART PLAINTIFF'S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AGAINST WILLIAM S. OLIVER AND SOUTH BEACH INVESTMENTS LLC (DOC. # 28 ); AWARDING $28,475.00 IN FAVOR OF PLAINTIFF AND AGAINST DEF ENDANTS WILLIAM'S. OLIVER AND SOUTH BEACH INVESTMENTS LLC ON COUNT II OF THE COMPLAINT; PLAINTIFF TO NOTIFY COURT WITHIN 20 DAYS WHETHER IT INTENDS TO PURSUE CONVERSION CLAIM; THIS DECISION AND ENTRY IS NOT A FINAL APPEALABLE ORDER AS PLAINTIFF'S STATE LAW CONVERSION CLAIM REMAINS UNADJUDICATED. Signed by Judge Walter H Rice on 01/29/13. (pb1) Modified on 1/29/2013 (pb1). (Southbeach)(Oliver)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
