Ricks v. Warden, Ohio Reformatory for Women
Petitioner: Ana Lisa Ricks
Respondent: Warden, Ohio Reformatory for Women
Case Number: 3:2011cv00240
Filed: July 11, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
Office: Dayton Office
County: UNION
Presiding Judge: Sharon L Ovington
Presiding Judge: Walter H Rice
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 28, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 26 Decision and Entry adopting United States Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendations as Corrected (Docs. 17 22 ), Supplemental Report and Recommendations (Doc. 22 , and Second Supplemental Report and Recommendations (Doc. 24 ) in their E ntirety; Overruling Petitioner's Objections thereto (Docs. 19 , 20 , 23 , 25 ); Dismissing with Prejudice Grounds One, Two, and Three of the Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. 4 ), and Dismissing Ground Four without Prejudice; Denying Anticipated Request for Certificate of Appealability and Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis; Termination Entry. Signed by Judge Walter H Rice on 9/28/2012. (kje1)
July 11, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 24 SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - Based on the foregoing analysis, it is again respectfully recommended that the Petition bedismissed with prejudice. Because reasonable jurists would not disagree with this conclusion, Petitioner should be denied a certificate of appealability and this Court should certify to the Sixth Circuit that any appeal would be objectively frivolous and should not be permitted to proceed in forma pauperis.Objections to R&R due by 7/30/2012. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R Merz on 07/10/2012. (kf)
July 6, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 22 CORRECTION TO ORIGINAL 17 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS; SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS that the Petition be dismissed with prejudice, except for Ground Four which should be dismissed without prejudice as noncognizable. Because reasonable j urists would not disagree with this conclusion, Petitionershould be denied a certificate of appealability and this Court should certify to the Sixth Circuit that any appeal would be objectively frivolous and should not be permitted to proceed in forma pauperis. Objections to R&R due by 7/23/2012.Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R Merz on 07/06/2012. (kf)
July 5, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 21 RECOMMITTAL ORDER - This case is before the Court on Respondent's Objections (Doc. 19 ) to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendations (Doc. 17 ). The District Judge has preliminarily considered the Objections and believes they wil l be more appropriately resolved after further analysis by the Magistrate Judge. Accordingly, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3), this matter is hereby returned to the Magistrate Judge with instructions to file a supplemental report analyzing the Objections and Response and making recommendations based on that analysis. Signed by Judge Walter H Rice on 7/5/12. (kje1)
June 15, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 16 DECISION AND ORDER - Petitioner's Motion for further post-pleading proceedings (Doc. No. 11) is DENIED except to the extent the relief requested therein has already been granted. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R Merz on 6/15/2012. (kpf1)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ricks v. Warden, Ohio Reformatory for Women
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Warden, Ohio Reformatory for Women
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Ana Lisa Ricks
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?