Vance v. Department of Veterans Affairs
| Marvin Vance |
| Department of Veterans Affairs |
| 3:2011cv00281 |
| August 9, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Dayton Office |
| MONTGOMERY |
| Michael J Newman |
| Thomas M Rose |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
37
ORDER: (1) GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS (DOC. 34 ); (2) DISMISSING PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT WITH PREJUDICE; AND (3) CLOSING THIS CASE. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J Newman on 01/29/13. (pb1) Modified on 1/29/2013 (pb1)(Vance).
|
|
Filing
31
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR PARTIAL DISMISSAL (DOC. 20 )- Defendant's motion for partial dismissal, therefore, is GRANTED, and all eleven of Plaintiff's claims -- other than his Title VII employment discrimination claim -- are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Plaintiff's Title VII claim is not dismissed, and remains pending for review. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J Newman on 5/18/2012. (sc1)
|
|
Filing
22
ORDER FOR PRELIMINARY Pretrial Conference set for 5/22/2012 11:30 AM via telephone before Magistrate Judge Michael J Newman. The parties are directed to call 1-877-336-1839, access code 2725365, security code 123456 and wait for the Court to join the conference. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J Newman on 4/24/2012. (gh1)
|
|
Filing
14
ORDER. For good cause shown, the Court RESCINDS the Report and Recommendation issued on January 24, 2012 (Doc. # 13 ). Plaintiff is afforded an additional thirty (30) days in which to make proper service. Plaintiff must effect proper service of process on or before February 24, 2012. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J Newman on 1/25/2012. (copy to USM) (mdf1)
|
|
Filing
13
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS AND NOTICE REGARDING OBJECTIONS. It is RECOMMENDED that Plaintiff's complaint be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE, and this case be TERMINATED upon the Courts docket. Objections to R&R due by 2/10/2012. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J Newman on 1/24/2012. (mdf1)
|
|
Filing
11
ORDER PROVIDING PLAINTIFF WITH AN ADDITIONAL TEN DAYS IN WHICH SERVE TO DEFENDANT. Plaintiff is afforded an ADDITIONAL TEN DAYS in which to make proper service. He is thus advised that, if he does not file proof of such service on or before January 1 3, 2012, his complaint will be dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m) -- for his failure to timely serve Defendant -- and also on account of his lack of prosecution. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J Newman on 01/03/2012. (kf)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Vance v. Department of Veterans Affairs | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Marvin Vance | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Department of Veterans Affairs | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
