Gessner v. Howard et al
Plaintiff: Mark E Gessner
Defendant: John S Howard, Thomas J Cope, Theodore F Trupp, Michael A Dorsten and Matthew T Beavers
Case Number: 3:2011cv00286
Filed: August 11, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
Office: Dayton Office
County: MONTGOMERY
Presiding Judge: Sharon L Ovington
Presiding Judge: Thomas M Rose
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 17, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 75 ENTRY AND ORDER OVERRULING GESSNERS OBJECTIONS 73 TO THE CHIEF MAGISTRATE JUDGES REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS; ADOPTING THE CHIEF MAGISTRATE JUDGES REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 72 IN ITS ENTIRETY; DENYING GESSNERS MOTION FOR PAUPERIS STATUS AND CERTIFYING THAT GESSNERS APPEAL IS NOT TAKEN IN GOOD FAITH. Signed by Judge Thomas M Rose on 9/17/13. (ep)
July 18, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 68 ORDER DISMISSING CASE - This Court ORDERS that this matter be DISMISSED and terminated on the docket records. Signed by Judge Thomas M Rose on 7/18/2013. (kf)
July 1, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 67 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE; NO LATER THAN JULY 10, 2013. Signed by Judge Thomas M Rose on 7/1/13. (ep)
June 19, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 65 Notice - The Court recently continued the trial to provide Plaintiff with time to retain counsel for further proceedings before United States District Judge Thomas M. Rose. No Motions or other matters are currently pending before the undersigned Judicial Officer. Given these circumstances, the Clerk of Court is hereby directed to terminate the reference of this case to the undersigned Judicial Officer until further Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Sharon L Ovington on 06/19/13. (pb1)
May 17, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 63 ENTRY AND ORDER SETTING HEARING ON NOTICE OF DISABILITY AND REQUEST FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL (DOC. 62 ). The Court hereby sets a hearing for Monday, May 20, 2013 at 10:00 a.m. on Plaintiff's motion requesting the appointment of counsel. The trial previously set for that day is vacated. DONE and ORDERED in Dayton, Ohio, this Friday, May 17, 2013. Signed by Judge Thomas M Rose on 5/16/13. (kje1)
May 7, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 57 ENTRY AND ORDER OVERRULING DEMAND TO VACATE ORDER AND ENTRY FILED ON MAY 1, 2013. DOC. 56 . Signed by Judge Thomas M Rose on 5/7/13. (kje1)
May 1, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 55 ENTRY AND ORDER DENYING SECOND MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME, DOC. 53 , ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION, DOC. 48 , AND GRANTING MOTION IN LIMINE SEEKING TO EXCLUDE PLAINTIFF'S UNLAWFUL ARREST CLAIM, DOC. 49 . Signed by Judge Thomas M Rose on 05/01/13. (pb1)
April 2, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 48 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - re 25 - IT IS THEREFORE RECOMMENDED THAT: 1. Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 25 ) be GRANTED; and 2. Gessner's Fourth Amendment claims remain pending against Officer Cope. Objections to R&R due by 4/19/2013. Signed by Chief Magistrate Judge Sharon L Ovington on 4/2/13. (kje1)
February 15, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 29 DECISION AND ENTRY - Accordingly, Plaintiff's Motion to Compel (Doc. 22 ) is DENIED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Sharon L Ovington on 2/15/13. (kje1)
January 16, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 27 PRO SE NOTICE OF MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT - If you fail to respond to the Motion for Summary Judgment not later than February 8, 2013, your case may be dismissed on the merits or for failure to prosecute. Signed by Magistrate Judge Sharon L Ovington on 1/16/2013. (kje1)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Gessner v. Howard et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John S Howard
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Thomas J Cope
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Theodore F Trupp
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michael A Dorsten
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Matthew T Beavers
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Mark E Gessner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?