Bach v. Drerup et al
| Terry Bach |
| Scott Drerup, Paul Markowski, John/Jane Doe, Kettering City Of and Kettering Police Dept |
| 3:2011cv00317 |
| September 2, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Dayton Office |
| MONTGOMERY |
| Thomas M Rose |
| Other Personal Injury |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
57
ENTRY AND ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO STRIKE (Doc. 54 ); GRANTING DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT(Doc. 37 ) AND TERMINATING THIS CASE. Signed by Judge Thomas M Rose on 1/14/13. (kje1)
|
|
Filing
23
DECISION AND ENTRY - IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT: 1. Plaintiffs Motion to File Amended Complaint and to Add Parties (Doc. 19 ) is GRANTED; 2. Plaintiff is directed to file and serve a copy of the Proposed Amended Complaint (Doc. 19 -1) on Defenda nts as Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint on or before March 26, 2012. 3. Defendants' Motion to Modify Preliminary Pretrial Conference Order (Doc. 22 ) is GRANTED; and 4. Defendants' disclosure of primary experts is due no later tha n April 19, 2012. Plaintiff's disclosure of rebuttal experts is due by May 18, 2012. All other deadlines set forth in the Preliminary Pretrial Conference Order (Doc. 16 ) remain unchanged. Signed by Magistrate Judge Sharon L Ovington on 3/16/2012. (kje1)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
