United States of America v. Account Contents of US Bank, Acct#******0518, in the name of Five Pillars Market and Restaurant, Al Idu Al-Gaheem, in the amount of $52,817.96 et al
| United States of America |
| Account Contents of US Bank, Acct#******0518, in the name of Five Pillars Market and Restaurant, Al Idu Al-Gaheem, in the amount of $52,817.96, Account Contents of US Bank, Acct#******0518, in the name of Five Pillars Market and Restaurant, Al Idu Al-Gaheem, in the amount of $13,884.40, $4,000.00 U.S. Currency, $1,650.00 U.S. Currency, $917.00 U.S. Currency, $6,600.00 U.S. Currency and $340.00 U.S. Currency |
| Bashirah A Al-Gaheem and Al Idu Al-Gaheem |
| 3:2011cv00346 |
| September 30, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Dayton Office |
| MONTGOMERY |
| Walter H Rice |
| Other |
| Civil Miscellaneous Case |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
28
JUDGMENT AND DECREE OF FORFEITURE AGAINST DEFENDANTS 1, 2, 3, 4 AND 5 granting 27 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings. Signed by Judge Walter H Rice on 9/14/12. (kje1)
|
|
Filing
26
ORDER granting 25 Motion Lifting Stay for Limited Purpose. Signed by Judge Walter H Rice on 9/12/12. (kje1)
|
|
Filing
22
ORDER: It is hereby ordered that the above captioned cause be administratively processed. Signed by Judge Walter H Rice on 2/1/12. (cib1) "Case Stayed by agreement of the parties pending resolution of underlying criminal case."
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
