Jacques v. Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff: William Jacques
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Case Number: 3:2011cv00443
Filed: December 21, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
Office: Dayton Office
County: MONTGOMERY
Presiding Judge: Michael J Newman
Presiding Judge: Walter H Rice
Nature of Suit: Disability Insurance
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 22, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 25 DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (DOC. # 24 ) IN ITS ENTIRETY; SUSTAINING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR ATTORNEY FEES UNDER EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT ("EAJA"), 28 U.S.C 2412(d) (DOC. # 23 ); AWARDING PLAINTIFF $3,800.00 IN EAJA FEES. Signed by Judge Walter H Rice on 8/22/2013. (jdf1)
August 1, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 24 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 23 MOTION for Attorney Fees under Equal Access to Justice Act filed by William Jacques - Based upon the foregoing, IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT: 1. Plaintiffs unopposed motion for EAJA fees and costs (doc. 23 ) be GRANTED, and Plaintiff be AWARDED the sum of $3,800.00 in EAJA fees and costs; and 2. As no further matters are pending for review, this case remains TERMINATED upon the Court's docket. Objections to R&R due by 8/19/2013. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J Newman on 08/01/13. (pb1)
June 14, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 22 ORDER STRIKING THE JOINT STIPULATION FOR AN EAJA FEES AND COSTS AWARD (DOC. 21 ). Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J Newman on 06/14/13. (pb1)
March 18, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 20 JUDGMENT is entered in favor of Plaintiff and that the Defendant Commissioner's Decision that Plaintiff William Jacques is not is not disabled be and therefore not entitled to benefits under the Social Security Act be and hereby is REVERSED and the action is REMANDED to the Defendant Commissioner for payment of benefits consistent with the Social Security Act with an onset date of December 7, 2007. Notice of disposal attached. Case Terminated. Signed on 3/18/2013. (sc1)
January 9, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 16 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION THAT: (1) THE ALJS NON-DISABILITY FINDING BE FOUND UNSUPPORTED BY SUBSTANTIAL EVIDENCE, AND REVERSED; (2) THIS CASE BE REMANDED FOR AN IMMEDIATE AWARD OF BENEFITS; AND (3) THIS CASE BE CLOSED. Objections to R&R due by 1/28/2013. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J Newman on 1/9/2013. (JurM)
March 1, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER REGARDING MANAGEMENT OF SOCIAL SECURITY CASES. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J Newman on 3/1/2012. (mdf1)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Jacques v. Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: William Jacques
Represented By: Gary Marc Blumenthal
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Represented By: John J Stark
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?