Stafford et al v. Jewelers Mutual Insurance Company
| John Stafford and US Diamond and Gold |
| Jewelers Mutual Insurance Company |
| 3:2012cv00050 |
| February 17, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Dayton Office |
| MONTGOMERY |
| Thomas M Rose |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
73
JUDGMENT in favor of Jewelers Mutual Insurance Company against John Stafford. Case Terminated. Notice of Disposal attached. Signed on 3/4/13. (kje1)
|
|
Filing
64
ORDER QUASHING SUBPOENAS - On Motion of the Defendant (Doc. No. 63) and exclusively on the following basis, the subpoenas issued herein to Howard Randell and David Eidelberg are QUASHED: the subpoenas are issued from this Court to persons outside the territorial jurisdiction of this Court and beyond its power to compel obedience. The Magistrate Judge implies no opinion on the other bases asserted for quashing the subpoenas. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R Merz on 2/14/2013. (kpf1)
|
|
Filing
57
DECISION AND ENTRY: Plaintiffs U.S. Diamond & Gold dba Stafford's and John Stafford's Motion to Compel, (Doc 41), is well taken and is hereby granted. Defendant Jewelers Mutual Insurance Company shall respond to Plaintiffs' discover y requests not later than January 4, 2013. Plaintiffs U.S. Diamond & Gold dba Stafford's and John Stafford's Motion to Modify Scheduling Order to Extend Plaintiffs' Expert Disclosure Deadline, (Doc. 42), is granted. Accordingly, the time within which Plaintiffs are to disclose their expert witnesses is extended to February 4, 2013.Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R Merz on 12/17/2012. (kpf1)
|
|
Filing
39
ENTRY AND ORDER GRANTING STAFFORD'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT (Doc. # 29 ) NOT LATER THAN TEN DAYS FOLLOWING ENTRY OF THIS ORDER; GRANTING JEWELERS NOT LATER THAN FIFTEEN DAYS FOLLOWING THE FILING OF AN AMENDED COMPLAINT TO FILE ANOTHER MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS AND FINDING THE PENDING MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS (Doc. # 13 ) AND THE PENDING MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Doc. # 27 ) MOOT PROVIDED STAFFORD FILES AN AMENDED COMPLAINT. Signed by Judge Thomas M Rose on 10/24/12. (pb1)
|
|
Filing
36
DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO COMPEL (Doc. No. 22) - Plaintiffs are ordered to produce all invoices received from SS&D related to the Prior Litigation not later than October 25, 2012. Plaintiffs will provide a statem ent under oath itemizing that portion of the SS&D invoices which represents fees billed for the counterclaim defense and any documents which support that itemization not later than October 25, 2012. The savings account statements are ordered produced not later than October 25, 2012. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R Merz on 10/12/2012. (kpf1)
|
|
Filing
35
ORDER WITHDRAWING REFERENCE OF MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT - In the interest of judicial economy, Preliminary Pretrial Conference Order (Doc. # 27 ) is amended to withdraw the reference of Plaintiffs pending Motion for Leave To File Amended Complaint (Doc. # 29 ) from Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz. Signed by Judge Thomas M Rose on 10/10/12. (pb1)
|
|
Filing
28
ORDER WITHDRAWING REFERENCE OF MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT re 27 - In the interest of judicial economy, Preliminary Pretrial Conference Order (Doc. 7 ) is amended to withdraw the reference of the pending Motion for Partial Summary (Doc. 27 ) from Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz. Signed by Judge Thomas M Rose on 9/18/12. (kje1)
|
|
Filing
26
ORDER WITHDRAWING REFERENCE OF MOTION FOR JUDGMENTON THE PLEADINGS In the interest of judicial economy, Preliminary Pretrial Conference Order (Doc. No. 7 ) is amended to withdraw the reference of the pending Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (Doc. No. 13 ) from Magistrate Judge Merz. Signed by Judge Thomas M Rose on 09/11/12. (pb1)
|
|
Filing
11
DECISION AND ORDER denying 8 Motion to Bifurcate, without prejudice to its renewal as set forth above. The Motion to Stay discovery on the bad faith and punitive damages claims is denied. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R Merz on 06/25/12. (pb1)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
