Reece v. Warden, Chillicothe Correctional Institution
Jimmie Lee Reece |
Warden, Chillicothe Correctional Institution |
3:2012cv00198 |
June 25, 2012 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
Dayton Office |
MONTGOMERY |
Timothy S. Black |
Michael R Merz |
General |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 DECISION AND ENTRY: (1) ADOPTING THE REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE (Docs. 7 , 11 ); (2) OVERRULING PETITIONER'S OBJECTIONS (Docs. 9 , 12 ); (3) DENYING PETITIONER'S MOTION TO REOPEN (Doc. 6 ); (4) DENYING ANY REQUESTED CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY and (5) CERTIFYING THAT ANY APPEAL WOULD BE OBJECTIVELY FRIVOLOUS. Signed by Judge Timothy S. Black on 10/18/2012. (mr1) |
Filing 11 SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - It is respectfully recommended that the Motion to Reopen the Judgment be denied. Because reasonable jurists would not disagree with this conclusion, it is also recommended that Petitioner be denied a certificate of appealability and that the Court certify that any appeal would be objectively frivolous. Objections to R&R due by 9/21/2012. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R Merz on 9/4/2012. (kpf1) |
Filing 10 RECOMMITTAL ORDER. Signed by Judge Timothy S. Black on 8/31/12. (mr1) |
Filing 7 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - Accordingly, it is hereby recommended that the Motion to Reopen be denied unless Petitioner provides, not later than the day on which objections are due to this Report, a satisfactory explanation of why his case is not barred by the statute of limitations. Objections to R&R due by 9/7/2012. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R Merz on 08/20/2012. (kf) |
Filing 5 CLERK'S JUDGMENT AFFIRMING 4 ORDER. (mr1) |
Filing 3 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - re 1 - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. Because this case is barred by the statute of limitations, it is respectfully recommended that it be dismissed with prejudice. Reasonable jurists would not disagree with this c onclusion, so Mr. Reece should be denied a certificate of appealability. This Court should certify to the Sixth Circuit that any appeal would be objectively frivolous and should therefore not be permitted to proceed in forma pauperis. Objections to R&R due by 7/13/2012. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R Merz on 6/25/2012. (kje1) |
Filing 2 TRANSFER ORDER - Pursuant to the June 1, 2012, change in the allocation of habeas corpus cases at the Dayton location of Court, the reference in the above-captioned case is hereby transferred from The Honorable Sharon L. Ovington to The Honorable Michael R. Merz. The initial assignment to Judge Ovington was caused by a computer programming error in the CM/ECF system. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R Merz on 6/25/12. (kje1) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Reece v. Warden, Chillicothe Correctional Institution | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: Warden, Chillicothe Correctional Institution | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Jimmie Lee Reece | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.