Hall v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Stephen Hall |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| 3:2012cv00322 |
| October 1, 2012 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Dayton Office |
| MONTGOMERY |
| Michael J Newman |
| Walter H Rice |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
20
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. The Report and Recommendation filed on February 4, 2014 (Doc. # 19 ) is ADOPTED in full; 2. Plaintiff is AWARDED $4,478.71 in EAJA fees; and 3. The case is TERMINATED on the docket of this Court. Signed by Judge Walter H Rice on 07/18/14. (pb1)
|
|
Filing
19
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION THAT THE PARTIES' JOINT STIPULATION FOR EAJA FEES BE CONSTRUED AS A JOINT, UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR $4,478.71 IN EAJA FEES, AND GRANTED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J Newman on 06/27/14. (pb1)
|
|
Filing
16
CLERK'S JUDGMENT with attached notice of disposal. Signed on 3/12/2014. (gh1)
|
|
Filing
13
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 3 Complaint filed by Stephen Hall - IT IS THEREFORE RECOMMENDED THAT: 1. The Commissioners non-disability finding be found unsupported by substantial evidence and REVERSED; 2. This matter be REMANDED to the Commissi oner under the Fourth Sentence of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), for proceedings consistent with this opinion; and 3. This case be CLOSED on the docket of this Court. Objections to R&R due by 2/21/2014. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J Newman on 02/04/14. (pb1)
|
|
Filing
8
ORDER REGARDING MANAGEMENT OF SOCIAL SECURITY CASES - The parties are ORDERED to comply with all provisions set forth in Sixth Amended Magistrate Judges General Order No. 11 (effective September 1, 2011. Counsel for the Commissioner is also ORDERED as follows: Prior to the filing of a Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff's Statement of Errors, the Commissioner's counsel shall review the administrative record (including all ALJ and Appeals Council decisions) and determine whether or not a remand is appropriate. If so, the Commissioner shall file a motion for remand in lieu of, and on or before the due date scheduled for, the Commissioner's Opposition Memorandum. All such motions for remand shall comply with S.D. Ohio Local Rule 7.3. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J Newman on 01/30/13. (pb1)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Hall v. Commissioner of Social Security | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Stephen Hall | |
| Represented By: | Stephanie D Dobson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security | |
| Represented By: | John J Stark |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
