United States ex rel. et al v. Quandel Group, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: United States and P-1 Contracting, Inc.
Defendant: Western Surety Company, Quandel Group, Inc. and Aspire Group of Ohio, LLC
Case Number: 3:2012cv00418
Filed: December 18, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
Office: Dayton Office
County: HAMILTON
Presiding Judge: Timothy S. Black
Presiding Judge: Michael J Newman
Nature of Suit: Miller Act
Cause of Action: 40 U.S.C. ยง 270 Miller Act
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 5, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 45 CLERK'S JUDGMENT with attached Notice of Disposal. Signed on 03/05/14. (pb1)
March 3, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 44 ORDER - For good cause shown, and because the motion remains unopposed, Defendants motion to dismiss is GRANTED. Plaintiffs claims against Defendants Quandel Group and Western Surety, and the respective counterclaims, are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Plaintiff's claims against Defendant Aspire Group are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. This case is TERMINATED upon the Courts docket. IT IS SO ORDERED granting 43 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J Newman on 03/03/14. (pb1)
January 24, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 42 ORDER: Re: 41 Correspondence. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J Newman on 1/24/14. (cib1)
November 1, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 40 ORDER: The Court construes the parties' stipulation (doc. 39 ) as a joint, unopposed motion to amend the Scheduling Order (doc. 30 ). For good cause shown, the motion is GRANTED, and the calendar is MODIFIED accordingly: Plaintiffs' Pr imary Experts: December 13, 2013; Defendants' Primary Experts: January 17, 2014; Plaintiffs' Rebuttal Experts: January 24, 2014; Discovery deadline: March 7, 2014; Dispositive motion deadline: April 4, 2014. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Newman on 11/1/2013. (jwc)
August 20, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 37 ORDER: Mr. Lester advised the Court that he is again being retained by Aspire Group of Ohio, LLC. Accordingly, the Clerk of Courts is ORDERED to note on the docket sheet of this case that Mr. Lester is counsel for Defendant Aspire Group of Ohio, LLC, and to ensure that he receives copies of all documents filed hereafter on CM/ECF. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Newman on 8/20/2013. (ef)
July 12, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 33 ORDER: (1) GRANTING DEFENDANT THE ASPIRE GROUP OF OHIO, LLCS UNOPPOSED MOTION TO DISMISS CROSSCLAIM (DOC. 32 ); AND (2) DISMISSING DEFENDANT THE ASPIRE GROUP OF OHIO, LLC S CROSSCLAIM AGAINST DEFENDANT THE QUANDEL GROUP, INC. WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J Newman on 7/12/2013. (kf)
May 21, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 31 ORDER denying 24 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings; denying 20 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings. Therefore, the Court DENIES both Aspires motion for judgment on the pleadings (doc. 20 ); and Western Suretys motion for judgment on the pleadings (doc. 24 ). Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J Newman on 5/21/2013. (kf)
April 18, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 28 ORDER RESCHEDULING THE PRELIMINARY PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCE FOR 2:30 P.M. TOMORROW, APRIL 19, 2013. Preliminary Pretrial Conference set for 4/19/2013 at 02:30 PM in Teleconference before Magistrate Judge Michael J Newman. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J Newman on 4/18/2013. (kf)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: United States ex rel. et al v. Quandel Group, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: United States
Represented By: Robert Thomas Dunlevey
Represented By: Donald B Rineer
Represented By: Richard Lines Carr, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: P-1 Contracting, Inc.
Represented By: Robert Thomas Dunlevey
Represented By: John Sidney Higgins, Jr
Represented By: Richard Lines Carr, Jr.
Represented By: Donald B Rineer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Western Surety Company
Represented By: John Sidney Higgins, Jr
Represented By: Shannah Jean Morris
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Quandel Group, Inc.
Represented By: John Sidney Higgins, Jr
Represented By: Shannah Jean Morris
Represented By: David Conrad Olson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Aspire Group of Ohio, LLC
Represented By: John Geoffrey Cobey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?