Iron Workers District Council Of Southern Ohio & Vicinity Benefit Trust et al v. Recast Erectors, Inc. et al

Justia Dockets & Filings Sixth Circuit Ohio Southern District Iron Workers District Council Of Southern Ohio & Vicinity Benefit Trust et al v. Recast Erectors, Inc. et al

Iron Workers District Council Of Southern Ohio & Vicinity Benefit Trust et al v. Recast Erectors, Inc. et al

Plaintiff:	Iron Workers District Council Of Southern Ohio & Vicinity Annuity Trust, Iron Workers District Council Of Southern Ohio & Vicinity Benefit Trust and Iron Workers District Council Of Southern Ohio & Vicinity Pension Trust
Defendant:	Recast Erectors, Inc. and Daniel Dawes
Case Number:	3:2013cv00036
Filed:	February 4, 2013
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
Office:	Dayton Office
County:	MONTGOMERY
Presiding Judge:	Timothy S. Black
Nature of Suit:	Labor: E.R.I.S.A.
Cause of Action:	29 U.S.C. § 1145 E.R.I.S.A.
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
June 20, 2013	Filing 9 CONDITIONAL ORDER OF DISMISSAL - The Court having been advised by the parties that this civil action has been settled and that only a final condition need be remedied to fully consummate the settlement; It is ORDERED that this action is hereby DISMI SSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE, provided that any of the parties may, upon good cause shown within 60 days, move to reopen the action if settlement is not fully consummated. The parties may timely move to substitute a judgment entry contemplated by the settl ement agreement. The Court expressly and explicitly retains jurisdiction to enforce the settlement agreement of the parties. The parties agree that, should the final settlement condition not be remedied within 60 days, good cause for reopening the case would exist. The parties may also jointly move the Court to extend the 60 day period should they deem such an extension appropriate. Signed by Judge Timothy S. Black on 6/20/2013. (mr1)

Date Filed

Document Text

June 20, 2013

Filing 9 CONDITIONAL ORDER OF DISMISSAL - The Court having been advised by the parties that this civil action has been settled and that only a final condition need be remedied to fully consummate the settlement; It is ORDERED that this action is hereby DISMI SSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE, provided that any of the parties may, upon good cause shown within 60 days, move to reopen the action if settlement is not fully consummated. The parties may timely move to substitute a judgment entry contemplated by the settl ement agreement. The Court expressly and explicitly retains jurisdiction to enforce the settlement agreement of the parties. The parties agree that, should the final settlement condition not be remedied within 60 days, good cause for reopening the case would exist. The parties may also jointly move the Court to extend the 60 day period should they deem such an extension appropriate. Signed by Judge Timothy S. Black on 6/20/2013. (mr1)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Iron Workers District Council Of Southern Ohio & Vicinity Benefit Trust et al v. Recast Erectors, Inc. et al
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Recast Erectors, Inc.
Represented By:	E Chase Dressman
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Daniel Dawes
Represented By:	E Chase Dressman
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Iron Workers District Council Of Southern Ohio & Vicinity Annuity Trust
Represented By:	Joseph C Hoffman, Jr
Represented By:	Joseph D Mando
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Iron Workers District Council Of Southern Ohio & Vicinity Benefit Trust
Represented By:	Joseph D Mando
Represented By:	Joseph C Hoffman, Jr
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Iron Workers District Council Of Southern Ohio & Vicinity Pension Trust
Represented By:	Joseph D Mando
Represented By:	Joseph C Hoffman, Jr
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?