Ross v. Teleperformance USA Inc et al
| Keesya D Ross |
| Charles Tyree, Troy Naboors, Teleperformance USA Inc, Mynette Murrell, Janette Jack, Chris Stewart, Calbert Duvall, Brian Harris and Brian Throckmorton |
| 3:2013cv00038 |
| February 6, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Dayton Office |
| GREENE |
| Timothy S. Black |
| Sharon L Ovington |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
98
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - IT IS THEREFORE RECOMMENDED THAT: 1. Ross's Motion to Amend or Alter Judgment (Doc. #96) be DENIED; 2. The Court certify that an appeal of an Order adopting this Report and Recommendations would not be taken in good faith, and leave for Plaintiff to appeal in forma pauperis should be denied; and, 3. The case remains terminated on the docket of this Court. Objections to R&R due by 9/25/2014. Signed by Chief Magistrate Judge Sharon L Ovington on 9/8/2014. (rms)
|
|
Filing
94
DECISION AND ENTRY: (1) ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE (Doc. 91 ); (2) OVERRULING PLAINTIFFS OBJECTIONS (Doc. 92 ); AND TERMINATING THIS CASE FROM THE DOCKET. Signed by Judge Timothy S. Black on 7/14/2014. (mr1)
|
|
Filing
91
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - IT IS THEREFORE RECOMMENDED THAT: 1. TPUSA's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. #70), Ross's Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Defendant's Request for Production of Documents (Doc. #72), and TPUSA's Moti on for Protective Order (Doc. #74) be DENIED as moot; 2. TPUSA's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. #86) be GRANTED; 3. Ross's Cross Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. #89) be DENIED as untimely and moot; 4. The Court certify pursuant to 28 U .S.C. §1915(a)(3) that an appeal of an Order adopting this Report and Recommendations would not be taken in good faith, and consequently, leave for Plaintiff to appeal in forma pauperis should be denied; and, 5. The case be terminated on the docket of this Court. Objections to R&R due by 6/23/2014. Signed by Chief Magistrate Judge Sharon L Ovington on 6/5/2014. (rms)
|
|
Filing
65
ORDER denying 64 Plaintiff's Motion for Extension of Time to Answer Defendant's Answer. Signed by Chief Magistrate Judge Sharon L Ovington on 1/27/2014. (rms)
|
|
Filing
61
ORDER setting forth deadlines and procedures for taking Plaintiff's deposition. Signed by Chief Magistrate Judge Sharon L Ovington on 1/9/2014.(rms)
|
|
Filing
46
DECISION AND ENTRY: (1) ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE (Doc. 34 ); (2) GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS THE AMENDED COMPLAINT (Doc. 25 ); (3) OVERRULING PLAINTIFF'S OBJECT IONS (Doc. 36 ); (4) DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR CONSIDERATION OF MORE DEFINITE STATEMENT AND URGENT MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Doc. 37 ); AND (5) DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTIONS TO STRIKE (Docs. 43 , 44 ). Signed by Judge Timothy S. Black on 11/25/2013. (mr1)
|
|
Filing
34
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS recommending Defendants TPUSA, Murrell, Kilmer, Naboors, Throckmorton, Stewart, and Duvall's 25 Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's 22 Amended Complaint be GRANTED in part and DENIED in part, as follows: Plaintiff&# 039;s Title VII claims against TPUSA, Inc., for disparate treatment employment discrimination based on race and sex be DISMISSED with prejudice; claims under Ohio Rev. Code § 4112.02(A)(2) against Defendants be DISMISSED with prejudice; claims u nder Ohio Rev. Code § 4112.02(I) against Defendants Murrell, Kilmer, Naboors, Throckmorton, Stewart, and Duvall be DISMISSED with prejudice; claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for First Amendment retaliation against Defendants be DISMISSED with prejudice; state law claims for Defamation, Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress, and violation of the Ohio Whistleblower Act against Defendants be DISMISSED with prejudice; Murrell, Kilmer, Naboors, Throckmorton, Stewart, and Duvall be TERMI NATED as Defendants; and, claims under Title VII and Ohio Rev. Code § 4112.02(I) for retaliation against Defendant TPUSA REMAIN PENDING. Objections to R&R due by 10/15/2013. Signed by Chief Magistrate Judge Sharon L Ovington on 9/25/2013. (rms)
|
|
Filing
31
CALENDAR ORDER - Required disclosures under Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1) due by 9/2/2013. Disclosure of lay witnesses: October 2, 2013. Discovery due by March 7, 2014. Dispositive Motions due by 4/7/2014. Signed by Magistrate Judge Sharon L Ovington on 7/31/2013. (kf)
|
|
Filing
27
NOTICE TO PRO SE PLAINTIFF OF MOTION TO DISMISS - re 25 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM. Signed by Magistrate Judge Sharon L Ovington on 6/19/2013. (kf)
|
|
Filing
21
ORDER - IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT: 1. Plaintiff Keesya D. Ross Motion to Amend Complaint (Doc. 9 ) is DENIED as moot; 2. Plaintiff shall file her revised First Amended Complaint with the Court on or before June 14, 2013;3. Defendants Motion for E xtension of Time to File Answer (Doc. 15 ) isDENIED as moot; 4. Defendants Motion to Strike Plaintiffs Application to Enter Default Judgment (Doc. 20 ) is GRANTED; and, 5. The case remains pending on the docket of this Court. Signed by Magistrate Judge Sharon L Ovington on 5/16/2013. (kf)
|
|
Filing
12
ORDER AND NOTICE TO PLAINTIFF - IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT: Plaintiffs Application to Clerk for Entry of Default Judgment (Doc. 10 ) is DENIED and her Motion to Amend Complaint (Doc. 9 ) remains pending. Signed by Magistrate Judge Sharon L Ovington on 4/17/2013. (kf)
|
|
Filing
7
DECISION AND ENTRY: (1) ADOPTING THE AMENDED REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE (Doc. 4 ); (2) DISMISSING ONLY THE TITLE VII CLAIMS AGAINST DEFENDANTS MURRELL, NABOORS, HARRIS, THROCKMORTON, DUVALL, TYREE, JACK AND STEWARD; (3) AND DIRECTING SERVICE ON ALL DEFENDANTS NAMED IN THE COMPLAINT. Signed by Judge Timothy S. Black on 3/8/2013. (mr1)
|
|
Filing
4
AMENDED 3 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - IT IS THEREFORE RECOMMENDED THAT: 1. Plaintiff's Complaint (Doc. 2 ) against Teleperformance USA, Inc. not be dismissed; 2. Plaintiff's state-law claims against Mynette Murrell, Troy Naboors, Bri an Harris, Brian Throckmorton, Calbert Duvall, Charles Tyree, Janette Jack, and Chris Stewart not be dismissed; 3. Plaintiff's Title VII claims against Mynette Murrell, Troy Naboors, Brian Harris, Brian Throckmorton, Calbert Duvall, Charles Tyre e, Janette Jack, and Chris Stewart be DISMISSED; and 4. The United States Clerk of Court be directed to serve a copy of the Complaint and attached Exhibits together with a summons upon each Defendant named in the Complaint. All costs of service to be advanced by the United States. Objections to R&R due by 3/4/2013. Signed by Magistrate Judge Sharon L Ovington on 2/13/2013. (sc1)
|
|
Filing
3
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - IT IS THEREFORE RECOMMENDED THAT: 1. Plaintiff's Complaint (Doc. 2 ) against Teleperformance USA, Inc. not be dismissed. 2. Plaintiff's state-law claims against Mynette Murrell, Troy Naboors, Brian Harris, Br ian Throckmorton, Calbert Duvall, Charles Tyree, Janette Jack, and Chris Stewart not be dismissed. 2. Plaintiff's Title VII claims against Mynette Murrell, Troy Naboors, Brian Harris, Brian Throckmorton, Calbert Duvall, Charles Tyree, Janette J ack, and Chris Stewart be DISMISSED. 3. The United States Clerk of Court be directed to serve a copy of the Complaint and attached Exhibits together with a summons upon each Defendant named in the Complaint. All costs of service to be advanced by the United States. Objections to R&R due by 3/1/2013. Signed by Magistrate Judge Sharon L Ovington on 2/12/13. (kje1)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
