TLC Realty 1 LLC v. Belfor USA Group Inc
Plaintiff: TLC Realty 1 LLC
Defendant: Belfor USA Group Inc
Case Number: 3:2013cv00056
Filed: February 25, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
Office: Dayton Office
County: MONTGOMERY
Presiding Judge: Thomas M Rose
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 3, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 65 ORDER OF DISMISSAL: TERMINATION ENTRY. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Newman on 2/3/2016. (srb)
January 8, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 53 DECISION AND ENTRY GRANTING IN PART DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. 41 ) - For the foregoing reasons, Belfors motion for summary judgment (doc. 41 ) is GRANTED with regard to TLCs unjust enrichment claim, and DENIED as to the § 1981 claim. The Court confirms the final pretrial conference scheduled for January 13, 2016 at 3:00 p.m. in chambers (Room 505, 200 West Second Street, Dayton, Ohio 45402). Counsel and a representative from both parties shall attend. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Newman on 1/8/2016. (srb)
August 17, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 36 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Newman on 8/17/2015. (srb)
August 5, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 33 ORDER - The Court GRANTS the parties joint motion. Doc. 32 . Recognizing that this case will be three years old in February 2016, the trial date will remain the same. Accordingly, the case shall proceed as follows: Discovery due by 9/21/2015., Dispositive motions due by 10/21/2015., Jury Trial set for 1/20/2016 at 9:00 AM in Courtroom 4 - Dayton before Magistrate Judge Michael J. Newman. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Newman on 8/5/15. (pb)
April 7, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 19 ORDER TO FILE RULE 26(F) REPORT - Due to the failure of parties to file their 26(f) report the Court vacates the Preliminary Pretrial Conference set for April 9, 2014 and further ORDERS the parties to file their 26(f) report no later than April 21, 2014. Signed by Judge Thomas M Rose on 4/7/14. (ep)
January 22, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ENTRY and ORDER granting 15 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge Thomas M Rose on 1-22-2014.(jab)
December 3, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 4 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. Plaintiffs Breach of Contract Claim Is Dismissed with Prejudice. Plaintiff to File Amended Complaint by December 13, 2013. Signed by Judge Thomas M Rose on 12/03/2013. (jab)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: TLC Realty 1 LLC v. Belfor USA Group Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: TLC Realty 1 LLC
Represented By: David Michael Duwel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Belfor USA Group Inc
Represented By: Christopher T O'Shaughnessy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?