Miller v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc. et al
| Carin Miller |
| Experian Information Solutions, Inc., Equifax, Inc., Trans Union LLC, Wites & Kapetan, P.A., Infinity Marketing Solutions, Inc. and Doe Company Debt Collector |
| 3:2013cv00090 |
| March 26, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Dayton Office |
| MONTGOMERY |
| Thomas M Rose |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
125
ENTRY AND ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO REOPEN CASE (DOC. 122 ); GRANTING IN PART TRANS UNION, LLC'S BILL OF COSTS (DOC. 104 ); AND GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART TRANS UNION, LLCS MOTION FOR ATTORNEY FEES AND SANCTIONS PURSUANT TO RULE 11, 2 8 U.S.C. § 1927, AND 15 U.S.C. § 1681 (DOC. 105 ) - The Court GRANTS Trans Unions Bill of Costs in the amount of $1,449.40 and GRANTS Trans Unions Motion for Attorney Fees and Sanctions pursuant to Rule 11 and 28 U.S.C. § 1927, b ut DENIES it with respect to 15 U.S.C. § 1681. Trans Union is ORDERED to file, by no later than October 14, 2016, a memorandum stating the amount of its requested attorneys' fees and why such amount is appropriate under Fed. R. Civ. P. 11 a nd 28 U.S.C. § 1927. Trans Union's memorandum shall not exceed 10 pages. Miller's counsel may file a memorandum in response to Trans Union's memorandum, also not to exceed 10 pages, by no later than October 28, 2016. Trans Union may file a reply memorandum, not to exceed 5 pages, by no later than November 4, 2016. Signed by Judge Thomas M. Rose on 9/22/2016. (ep)
|
|
Filing
117
ENTRY AND ORDER GRANTING MILLER'S RENEWED MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT AGAINST INFINITY (Doc. 103 ) AND AWARDING $23,735 IN DAMAGES. Plaintiff's Renewed Motion for Default Judgment Against Infinity is granted. Plaintiff is awarded $23,735 in damages from Infinity. Signed by Judge Thomas M Rose on 4/13/15. (ep)
|
|
Filing
108
ENTRY AND ORDER SETTING AN EVIDENTIARY HEARING - Evidentiary Hearing set for 4/9/2015 AT 10:30 AM in Courtroom 2 - Dayton before Judge Thomas M Rose. Signed by Judge Thomas M Rose on 3/3/15. (ep)
|
|
Filing
102
AMENDED ENTRY AND ORDER OVERRULING MILLER'S MOTION TO STRIKE (Doc. 95 ) AND GRANTING TRANS UNION'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Doc. 89 ) - Plaintiff is given not later than fourteen (14) days following the entry of this Order to renew a motion for default judgment against Infinity. Failure to do so will result in the captioned cause being terminated. Signed by Judge Thomas M Rose on 2/19/15. (ep)
|
|
Filing
101
ENTRY AND ORDER OVERRULING MILLER'S MOTION TO STRIKE (Doc. 95 ) AND GRANTING TRANS UNIONS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Doc. 89 ): Miller is given until not later than fourteen (14) days following entry of this Order to renew a motion for defau lt judgment against Infinity. Failure to do so will result in the captioned cause being terminated upon the docket records of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio, Western Division, at Dayton. Signed by Judge Thomas M Rose on 2/12/15. (ep)
|
|
Filing
88
ENTRY AND ORDER GRANTING MILLER'S MOTION TO STRIKE (Doc. 72 ) AND DENYING MILLER'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Doc. 63 )- Without evidence of willful noncompliance, Miller is not entitled to the requested summary judgment on her claim re garding the June 2014 Credit Report provided via discovery by Trans Union. Miller's Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED. Since Miller is the Plaintiff in this lawsuit, this lawsuit remains to be adjudicated. Signed by Judge Thomas M Rose on 11/5/14. (ep)
|
|
Filing
86
ORDER denying 74 Motion for Sanctions Based on all of the foregoing, Millers motion for sanctions against Transunion for spoliation of evidence, doc. 74 , is DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J Newman on 10/31/2014. (ead1)
|
|
Filing
75
ENTRY AND ORDER ESTABLISHING EXPEDITED BRIEFING SCHEDULES ON PENDING MOTIONS - re 72 Motion to Strike and 74 Motion for Sanctions filed by Carin Miller. Defendant Transunion is given until not later than October 10, 2014, to respond to both pending Motions, and Plaintiff Miller is given until not later than October 17, 2014 to reply. Signed by Judge Thomas M Rose on 10/2/14. (ep)
|
|
Filing
60
DISCOVERY ORDER. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J Newman on 07/21/14. (pb1)
|
|
Filing
58
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION (DOC. 46 ). Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J Newman on 07/18/14. (pb1)
|
|
Filing
56
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 48 - The parties' two stipulations for voluntary dismissal with prejudice of defendants, Experian Information Solutions, Inc. and Wites & Kapetain, P.A. pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) [42, 43] be construed as joint, unopposed motions to dismiss pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 21; both motions are granted and defendants Experian Information Solutions, Inc. and Wites & Kapetan, P.A. are dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Judge Thomas M Rose on 7-17-2014. (de)
|
|
Filing
48
REPORT & RECOMMENDATION1 THAT: (1) THE PARTIES STIPULATION OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE OF DEFENDANTS, EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC. AND WITES & KAPETAN, P.A., PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) (DOCS. 42, 43) BE CONSTRUED AS JOINT, UNOPPOSED MOTIONS TO DISMISS PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P. 21; (2) BOTH MOTIONS BE GRANTED; AND (3) DEFENDANTS EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC. AND WITES & KAPETAN, P.A. BE DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Objections to R&R due by 7/10/2014. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J Newman on 06/23/14. (pb1)
|
|
Filing
47
ORDER - 1. The parties shall provide memoranda summarizing their discovery disputes for the Court on or before Thursday, June 26, 2014. Such writings shall address the issues raised at the discovery hearing held on June 20, 2014, as well as any ot her outstanding discovery issues in this case. Responses to such filings, if any, shall be submitted to the Court on or before Wednesday, July 2, 2014; 2. Regarding Defendant Trans Unions Motion for Reconsideration (doc. 46 ), Plaintiffs response, if any, shall be due on or before Friday, June 27, 2014. Following this date, the Court shall consider this motion ripe and proceed to rule. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J Newman on 06/20/14. (pb1)
|
|
Filing
44
AGREED STIPULATION AND PROTECTIVE ORDER. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J Newman on 06/17/14. (pb1)
|
|
Filing
38
ORDER: By June 11, 2014, Plaintiff shall re-file the draft pleading; confirm in a writing to be docketed that Plaintiff has produced all of the documents she has; produce a timeline of events giving rise to the claims here at issue; and shall prepar e new responses to Trans Union's discovery requests which comply in all respects with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. By June 11, 2014, all parties to this case shall sign a draft Protective Order and submit the document, in Word, to chambers (newman_chambers@ohsd.uscourts.gov) for the Court's review. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Newman on 6/4/2014. (jc1)
|
|
Filing
28
ENTRY AND ORDER DENYING MILLER'S MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT AGAINST INFINITY (Doc. 26 ) WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Thomas M Rose on 2/12/14. (ep)
|
|
Filing
18
ORDER re 1 Complaint filed by Carin Miller. Plaintiffs time for filing proof of service or waiver expired July 29, 2013. Unless proof of service is filed by September 30, 2013, the Court will dismiss the defendant, Infinity Marketing Solutions, Inc., from this action for lack of service of process. Signed by Judge Thomas M Rose on 9/17/13. (ep)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
