United States of America v. Howell
Petitioner: United States of America
Respondent: Michael L Howell
Case Number: 3:2013cv00157
Filed: September 7, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
Office: Dayton Office
Presiding Judge: Timothy S. Black
Presiding Judge: Michael J Newman
Nature of Suit: Other

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 16, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER TO CLERK - Upon examination of the Attorney Guide for CM/ECF filing, the Court determines that this case should have been opened as a civil case rather than a miscellaneous case. It is accordingly ORDERED that the Clerk reopen this case as a regular civil case. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J Newman on 5/16/2013. (kf)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: United States of America v. Howell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: United States of America
Represented By: Margaret A Schutte
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Michael L Howell
Represented By: John Peter Hilgeman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?