Hirtzinger v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| Jodi K Hirtzinger |
| 3:2013cv00351 |
| October 11, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Dayton Office |
| CLARK |
| Sharon L Ovington |
| Walter H Rice |
| Supplemental Security Income |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
20
DECISION AND ENTRY - it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. The Report and Recommendations filed on September 11, 2014 (Doc. # 19 ) is adopted in full; 2. The parties' Stipulation for Award of Attorney Fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act (Doc. # 18 ) is accepted, and Defendant is directed to pay Plaintiffs attorney fees under 28 U.S.C. §2412 in the total amount of $4,750.00; 3. Defendant is directed to verify, within thirty days of this Decision and Entry, whether or not Plaintif f owes a pre-existing debt to the United States subject to offset. And, if no such pre-existing debt exists, Defendant is directed to pay the EAJA award directly to Plaintiffs attorney; and, 4. The case remains terminated on the docket of this Court. Signed by Judge Walter H Rice on 09/30/14. (pb1)
|
|
Filing
19
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS that 18 the parties' Stipulation for Award Of Attorney Fees be accepted, and Defendant be directed to pay Plaintiffs attorney fees in the total amount of $4,750.00; Defendant be directed to verify, within thirt y days of this Decision and Order, whether or not Plaintiff owes a pre-existing debt to the United States subject to offset. And, if no such pre-existing debt exists, Defendant be directed to pay the EAJA award directly to Plaintiff's attorney; the case the case remains terminated on the docket of this Court. Objections to R&R due by 9/29/2014. Signed by Chief Magistrate Judge Sharon L Ovington on 9-11-14. (mm1)
|
|
Filing
17
CLERK'S JUDGMENT with attached Notice of Disposal. Signed on 08/26/14. (pb1)
|
|
Filing
15
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS recommending that 14 the Parties' Joint MOTION to Remand be GRANTED; the Clerk of Court be directed to enter Judgment in favor of Plaintiff and against Defendant reversing Defendant's final decision and remanding this matter to the Social Security Administration for further proceedings; and the case be terminated on the docket of this Court. Objections to R&R due by 8/25/2014. Signed by Chief Magistrate Judge Sharon L Ovington on 8-7-14. (mm1)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Hirtzinger v. Commissioner of Social Security | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security | |
| Represented By: | John J. Stark |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Jodi K Hirtzinger | |
| Represented By: | Jason M Mauch |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
