Rieger v. General Dynamics
Joseph Michael Rieger |
General Dynamics |
3:2013cv00402 |
November 25, 2013 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
Dayton Office |
MONTGOMERY |
Michael J Newman |
Walter H Rice |
Employment |
42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 52 ORDER DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO SCHEDULE A TELEPHONE CONFERENCE (DOC. 51 ). NOTICE TO PRO SE PLAINTIFF THAT FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH COURT ORDERS OR DISCOVERY RULES COULD RESULT IN DISMISSAL OF HIS CASE. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the parties personally appear before the undersigned in Courtroom 5 of the Dayton Federal Courthouse on Wednesday, June 4, 2014 at 9:00 a.m. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J Newman on 05/29/14. (pb1) |
Filing 48 ORDER GRANTING (doc. 46 ) Motion to depose Marge Sliemers and Mary Hitt and the deposition schedule set forth in the Court's April 16, 2014 Order (doc. 43 ) is MODIFIED accordingly. Plaintiff shall work with Defendant's counsel in a cooperative fashion to schedule these two depositions prior to the discovery deadline. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J Newman on 5/1/14. (cib1) |
Filing 47 ORDER: (1) GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR A PROTECTIVE ORDER FORBIDDING THE DISCLOSURE OF HIS SEALED STATE CRIMINAL CONVICTION (DOC. 37 ); AND (2) DENYING AS MOOT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO POSTPONE HIS APRIL 29, 2014 DEPOSITION (DOC. 45 ). Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J Newman on 4/25/14. (cib1) |
Filing 43 ORDER - Re: Depositions. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J Newman on 4/16/14. (cib1) |
Filing 39 ORDER - Plaintiff is ORDERED to produce all responsive information and documents that he seeks to protect from disclosure for review and inspection by the Court. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J Newman on 04/07/14. (pb1) |
Filing 34 PROTECTIVE ORDER. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J Newman on 03/21/14. (pb1) |
Filing 31 ORDER - Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the deposition of Joseph M. Rieger will occur on April 29, 2014 beginning at 9:30 a.m. in Courtroom 5 of the Federal Courthouse, 200 West Second Street, Fifth Floor, Dayton, Ohio 45402. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J Newman on 03/20/14. (pb1) |
Filing 30 ORDER - Plaintiff is ORDERED to review the Courts March 10th Orders and attempt to resolve all matters extrajudicially with Defendants counsel. If the parties are unable to reach a resolution, they may contact the Court to request a conference after March 24, 2014. A copy of this order was mailed to the Pro Se Plaintiff at the address listed on the docket. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J Newman on 3/13/2014. (gh1) |
Filing 29 ORDER - The Court issued an Order on March 10, 2014, which addressed several issues raised during the call. Doc. 28 . One additional issue remains for resolution; namely, the order of depositions. As an initial matter, the Court expresses its reluctance to decide deposition scheduling. In the future, the Court expects such matters to be resolved - in good faith and cooperatively - amongst the parties. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J Newman on 03/10/14. (pb1) |
Filing 26 ORDER: (1) DENYING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO STAY (DOC. 21 ); (2) DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO COMPEL (DOC. 23 ); AND (3) DIRECTING THE CLERK OF COURTS TO RE-DOCKET PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO APOLOGIZE (DOC. 24 ). Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J Newman on 2/28/14. (cib1) |
Filing 18 ORDER - the Court NOTES that the properly-named Defendant here is General Dynamics Information Technology, Inc. All future filings, by both sides, shall reference this party name. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J Newman on 02/06/14. (pb1) Modified text for clarity on 2/6/2014 (tt). |
Filing 15 ORDER - Plaintiff is DIRECTED to contact the undersigned's courtroom deputy, Ms. Connie Berry, on or before January 31, 2014 in order to reschedule the conference. Ms. Berry may be reached at (937) 512-1640. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J Newman on 1/27/14. (cib1) |
Filing 12 Order Following Conference Call. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J Newman on 1/10/14. (cib1) |
Filing 11 DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (8) IN ITS ENTIRETY; DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT (7).. Signed by Judge Walter H Rice on 1/6/2014. (gh1) |
Filing 10 ORDER denying 9 Motion. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J Newman on 01/02/14. (pb1) |
Filing 8 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 7 MOTION for Default Judgment against General Dynamics Information Technology filed by Joseph Michael Rieger - The Court RECOMMENDS that Plaintiffs motion (doc. 7 ) be denied. Objections to R&R due by 1/3/2014. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J Newman on 12/17/13. (pb1) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Rieger v. General Dynamics | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Joseph Michael Rieger | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: General Dynamics | |
Represented By: | Robert Frederick Seidler |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.