Osborne v. Commissioner of Social Security

Justia Dockets & Filings Sixth Circuit Ohio Southern District Osborne v. Commissioner of Social Security

Osborne v. Commissioner of Social Security

Plaintiff:	Billie Osborne
Defendant:	Commissioner of Social Security
Case Number:	3:2013cv00425
Filed:	December 23, 2013
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
Office:	Dayton Office
County:	MONTGOMERY
Presiding Judge:	Michael J Newman
Presiding Judge:	Walter H Rice
Nature of Suit:	Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
October 6, 2015	Filing 17 DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING IN PART AND REJECTING IN PARTREPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE (DOC. # 12 ); PLAINTIFF'S OBJECTIONS TO SAID JUDICIAL FILING (DOC. # 14 ) SUSTAINED; JUDGMENT TO BE ENTERED IN FAVOR OF PLAINTI FF AND AGAINST DEFENDANT COMMISSIONER, REVERSING COMMISSIONER'S DECISION THAT PLAINTIFF WAS NOT DISABLED AND, THEREFORE, NOT ENTITLED TO BENEFITS UNDER THE SOCIAL SECURITY ACT, AND REMANDING THE CAPTIONED CAUSE TO THE DEFENDANT COMMISSIONER FOR THE IMMEDIATE PAYMENT OF BENEFITS FOR THE CLOSED PERIOD FROM JULY I, 2009, THROUGH AUGUST, 2010; TERMINATION ENTRY. Signed by Judge Walter H. Rice on 10/6/2015. (srb)
January 23, 2015	Filing 12 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION1 THAT: (1) THE ALJS NON-DISABILITY FINDING BE FOUND SUPPORTED BY SUBSTANTIAL EVIDENCE, AND AFFIRMED; AND (2) THIS CASE BE CLOSED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J Newman on 1/23/2015. (srb1)

Date Filed

Document Text

October 6, 2015

Filing 17 DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING IN PART AND REJECTING IN PARTREPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE (DOC. # 12 ); PLAINTIFF'S OBJECTIONS TO SAID JUDICIAL FILING (DOC. # 14 ) SUSTAINED; JUDGMENT TO BE ENTERED IN FAVOR OF PLAINTI FF AND AGAINST DEFENDANT COMMISSIONER, REVERSING COMMISSIONER'S DECISION THAT PLAINTIFF WAS NOT DISABLED AND, THEREFORE, NOT ENTITLED TO BENEFITS UNDER THE SOCIAL SECURITY ACT, AND REMANDING THE CAPTIONED CAUSE TO THE DEFENDANT COMMISSIONER FOR THE IMMEDIATE PAYMENT OF BENEFITS FOR THE CLOSED PERIOD FROM JULY I, 2009, THROUGH AUGUST, 2010; TERMINATION ENTRY. Signed by Judge Walter H. Rice on 10/6/2015. (srb)

January 23, 2015

Filing 12 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION1 THAT: (1) THE ALJS NON-DISABILITY FINDING BE FOUND SUPPORTED BY SUBSTANTIAL EVIDENCE, AND AFFIRMED; AND (2) THIS CASE BE CLOSED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J Newman on 1/23/2015. (srb1)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Osborne v. Commissioner of Social Security
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Billie Osborne
Represented By:	Gary Marc Blumenthal
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Represented By:	John J. Stark
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?