Wilson v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Leslie Wilson |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| 3:2014cv00085 |
| March 14, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Dayton Office |
| MONTGOMERY |
| Sharon L Ovington |
| Walter H Rice |
| Disability Insurance |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
30
DECISION AND ENTRY OVERRULING DEFENDANT COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY'S OBJECTIONS (DOC. # 28 ) TO THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS (DOC. # 27 ) OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE; ADOPTING SAID RECOMMENDATIONS IN FULL; OVERRULING DEFENDANT COMMISSIONER&# 039;S MOTION TO ALTER JUDGMENT (DOC. # 25 ); JUDGMENT REMAINS IN EFFECT IN FAVOR OF PLAINTIFF AND AGAINST DEFENDANT COMMISSIONER; CAPTIONED CASE REMANDED TO THE DEFENDANT COMMISSIONER FOR THE IMMEDIATE PAYMENT OF BENEFITS CONSISTENT WITH THE SOCIAL SECURITY ACT (DOC. # 23 ). Signed by Judge Walter H. Rice on 8/2/16. (kma)
|
|
Filing
27
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: 1) Defendant's Motion to Alter Judgment 25 be denied; and 2) The case remain terminated on the docket of this Court. Objections to R&R due by 3/14/2016. Signed by Chief Magistrate Judge Sharon L. Ovington on 2/26/16. (mcm)
|
|
Filing
23
DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING IN PART A D REJECTING IN PART REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE (DOC. # 18 ); DEFENDANT'S OBJECTIONS TO SAID JUDICIAL FILING (DOC. # 21 ) OVERRULED; JUDGMENT TO BE ENTERED IN FAVOR OF PLAINT IFF AND AGAINST DEFENDANT COMMISSIONER, REVERSING COMMISSIONER'S DECISION THAT PLAINTIFF WAS NOT DISABLED AND, THEREFORE, NOT ENTITLED TO BENEFITS U DER THE SOC IAL SECURITY ACT, AND REMANDING THE CAPTIONED CAUSE TO THE DEFENDANT COMMISSIONER FOR THE IMMEDIATE PAYMENT OF BENEFITS CONSISTENT WITH THE SOCIAL SECURITY ACT; TERMINATION ENTRY. Signed by Judge Walter H. Rice on 9/28/15. (pb)
|
|
Filing
18
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - IT IS THEREFORE RECOMMENDED THAT: 1. The Commissioner's non-disability finding be vacated; 2. No finding be made as to whether Plaintiff Leslie Wilson was under a disability within the meaning of the Social Security Act; 3. This case be remanded to the Commissioner and the Administrative Law Judge under Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for further consideration consistent with this Report; and 4. The case be terminated on the docket of this Court. Objections to R&R due by 5/26/2015. Signed by Chief Magistrate Judge Sharon L. Ovington on 5/6/2015. (rms)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Wilson v. Commissioner of Social Security | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Leslie Wilson | |
| Represented By: | Steven Barry Horenstein |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security | |
| Represented By: | John J. Stark |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
