Barrett v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Larry Barrett |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| 3:2014cv00102 |
| March 31, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Dayton Office |
| MONTGOMERY |
| Sharon L Ovington |
| Thomas M Rose |
| Disability Insurance |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
23
DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - The Report and Recommendations filed on October 22, 2015 22 is ADOPTED in full, Plaintiff's Motion For Attorney Fees Under The Equal Access To Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. §2412(d) 21 is GRANTED, the Commissioner is directed to pay Plaintiff's attorney fees in the total amount of $4,091.82; and the case remains terminated on the docket of this Court. Signed by Judge Thomas M. Rose on 11-10-2015. (de)
|
|
Filing
22
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: 21 Plaintiff's Motion For Attorney Fees Under The Equal Access To Justice Act be GRANTED; the Commissioner be directed to Plaintiff's attorney fees in the total amount of $4,091.82; and the case remain terminated on the docket of this Court. Objections to R&R due by 11/9/2015. Signed by Chief Magistrate Judge Sharon L. Ovington on 10-22-15. (mcm)
|
|
Filing
19
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - The Report and Recommendations filed on June 4, 2015 18 is ADOPTED in full, the Commissioner's non-disability finding is vacated, no finding is made as to whether Plaintiff was under a "disabili ty" within the meaning of the Social Security Act, this case is remanded to the Commissioner and the Administrative Law Judge under Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. Section 405(g) for further consideration consistent with this Decision and Entry and the Report and Recommendations; and this case is terminated on the docket of this Court. Signed by Judge Thomas M. Rose on 6-24-2015. (de)
|
|
Filing
18
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - IT IS THEREFORE RECOMMENDED THAT: 1. The Commissioner's non-disability finding be vacated; 2. No finding be made as to whether Plaintiff Larry Barrett was under a disability within the meaning of the Social Security Act; 3. This case be remanded to the Commissioner and the Administrative Law Judge under Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for further consideration consistent with this Report; and 4. The case be terminated on the docket of this Court. Objections to R&R due by 6/22/2015. Signed by Chief Magistrate Judge Sharon L. Ovington on 6/4/2015. (rms)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Barrett v. Commissioner of Social Security | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Larry Barrett | |
| Represented By: | Steven Barry Horenstein |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security | |
| Represented By: | John J. Stark |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
