Thornsbury v. Crowe et al
Plaintiff: Carla Thornsbury
Defendant: Brian Crowe and Montgomery County Sheriff
Case Number: 3:2014cv00165
Filed: May 22, 2014
Court: U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
Office: Dayton Office
County: MONTGOMERY
Presiding Judge: Walter H Rice
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 2, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 17 DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING UNITED STATES MAGISTRATEJUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS (DOC. #16); SUSTAINING IN PART AND OVERRULING IN PART DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS AS TO PLAINTIFF'S SECOND CAUSE OF ACTION (DOC . #8); DISMISSING WITHOUT PREJUDICE PLAINTIFF'S STATE LAW CLAIM OF MALICIOUS PROSECUTION; GIVING PLAINTIFF 14 DAYS TO FILE A MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND HER COMPLAINT; SUSTAINING DEFENDANTS' UNOPPOSED JOINT MOTION TO BIFURCATE CLAIMS AND STA Y DEFICIENT POLICY CLAIM (DOC. #11). Defendants' unopposed Joint Motion to Bifurcate Claims and Stay DeficientPolicy Claim, Doc. #11, is SUSTAINED. Defendants' Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings as to Plaintiff's Second Cause of Act ion, Doc. #8, is SUSTAINED IN PART and OVERRULED IN PART. Plaintiff's claim of malicious prosecution under Ohio law is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Plaintiff shall have 14 days to move for leave to file an amended complaint, to clarify whether her malicious prosecution claim is brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Signed by Judge Walter H Rice on 2/2/2015. (srb1)
January 13, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 16 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: 8 Defendants' Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings as to Plaintiff's Second Cause of Action be GRANTED, in part, and DENIED in part; Plaintiff's claim of malicious prosecution under Ohio law be DISMISSE D without prejudice to renewal; Plaintiff be given 14 days to file a Motion to Amend her Complaint, in the event she seeks to do so; and, 11 Defendants' Joint Motion to Bifurcate Claims and Stay Deficient Policy Claim be GRANTED as unopposed. Objections to R&R due by 1/30/2015. Signed by Chief Magistrate Judge Sharon L. Ovington on 1-13-15. (mcm1)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Thornsbury v. Crowe et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Carla Thornsbury
Represented By: Dwight Dean Brannon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Brian Crowe
Represented By: Liza Jean Luebke
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Montgomery County Sheriff
Represented By: Liza Jean Luebke
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?