Harrison v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
| Tetra K Harrison |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| 3:2014cv00218 |
| July 1, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Dayton Office |
| CLARK |
| Sharon L Ovington |
| Walter H Rice |
| Supplemental Security Income |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
21
DECISION AND ORDER - Accordingly, the Court hereby ORDERS that:1. The parties' Agreed Petition For An Award Of Attorney Fees Under TheEqual Access to Justice Act (Doc. #20) is accepted, and Defendant shall payPlaintiffs attorney fees under 28 U.S.C. §2412 in the total amount of$5,300.00;2. Plaintiffs Motion For Award Of Attorney Fees And Costs Pursuant To The Equal Access To Justice Act (Doc. # 19 ) is denied as moot; 3. Defendant shall verify, within thirty days of this Decisi on and Order, whether or not Plaintiff owes a pre-existing debt to the United States subject to offset. If no such pre-existing debt exists, Defendant shall pay the EAJA award directly to Plaintiffs attorney; and4. The case remains terminated on the docket of this Court. Signed by Judge Walter H. Rice on 9/28/15. (pb)
|
|
Filing
17
DECISION AND ENTRY - It is therefore ORDERED that: 1. The Report and Recommendations filed on June 10, 2015 (Doc. # 15 ) is ADOPTED in full; 2. The Commissioner's non-disability finding is VACATED; 3. No finding is made regarding whether Plain tiff Tetra K. Harrison is under a "disability" within the meaning of the Social Security Act; 4. This matter is REMANDED to the Social Security Administration pursuant to Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. §405(g) for further proceedings consistent with the Report and Recommendations, and this Decision and Entry; and 5. The case is terminated on the docket of this Court. Signed by Judge Walter H Rice on 07/27/15. (pb)
|
|
Filing
15
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS that the Commissioner's non-disability finding be vacated; no finding be made as to whether Plaintiff was under a "disability"; this case be remanded to the Commissioner and the Administrative Law Judge for f urther consideration consistent with this Report and a Decision and Entry adopting this Report; and the case be terminated on the docket of this Court. Objections to R&R due by 6/29/2015. Signed by Chief Magistrate Judge Sharon L. Ovington on 6/10/15. (mcm1)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Harrison v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Tetra K Harrison | |
| Represented By: | Jason M Mauch |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security | |
| Represented By: | John J. Stark |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
