Easterling v. Crawford
Plaintiff: Warren Easterling
Defendant: Dale Crawford, Judge
Case Number: 3:2014cv00226
Filed: July 10, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
Office: Dayton Office
County: MONTGOMERY
Presiding Judge: Michael R Merz
Presiding Judge: Walter H Rice
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1985
Jury Demanded By: None
RSS Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 24, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 51 DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS ON MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM JUDGMENT (DOC. # 49 ); OVERRULING PLAINTIFF'S OBJECTIONS THERETO (DOC. # 50 ); OVERRULING PLAINTIFF'S "MOTION FOR RE LIEF OF JUDGMENT (RULE 60b3)" (DOC. # 48 ); JUDGMENT TO ENTER IN FAVOR OF DEFENDANT AND AGAINST PLAINTIFF; CASE TO REMAIN TERMINATED ON DOCKET. Signed by Judge Walter H. Rice on 3/23/2016. (ead)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
January 4, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 49 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS ON MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM JUDGMENT - It is respectfully recommended that Plaintiff's fourth Motion for Relief from Judgment under Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b)(ECF No. 48) be denied. Objections to R&R due by 1/22/2016. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz on 1/4/2016. (kpf)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
December 14, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 47 DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE (DOC. # 44 ) IN THEIR ENTIRETY; PLAINTIFF'S OBJECTIONS TO SAID JUDICIAL FILING (DOC. # 45 ) OVERRULED; THIRD MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM JUDGMENT (DOC.# 43 ) OVERRULED. Signed by Judge Walter H. Rice on 12/14/2015. (srb)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
November 25, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 44 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - It is respectfully recommended that Plaintiff's Motion for Relief from Judgment (ECF No. 43) be denied. Objections to R&R due by 12/14/2015. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz on 11/25/2015. (kpf)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
November 19, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 42 DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS ON SECOND MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM JUDGMENT (DOC. # 40 ); OVERRULING PLAINTIFF'S OBJECTIONS THERETO (D0C. # 41 ) AND PLAINTIFF'S "MOTION FOR RE LIEF OF JUDGMENT (RULE 60B)" (DOC. # 39 ) - Based on the reasoning and citations of authority set forth by United States Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz in his September 23, 2015, Report and Recommendations on Second Motion for Relief from Ju dgment (Doc. # 40 ), as well as on a thorough de novo review of this Court's file and the applicable law, the Court ADOPTS said judicial filing. Plaintiff's Objections thereto (Doc. # 41 ) are OVERRULED for reasons previously explained. See Docs. ## 36 , 38 . Plaintiff's "Motion for Relief of Judgment (Rule 60B)" (Doc. # 39 ) isOVERRULED. The above-captioned case shall remain terminated on this Court'sdocket. Signed by Judge Walter H. Rice on 11/19/2015. (srb)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
September 8, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 38 DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS (DOC. # 36 ); OVERRULING PLAINTIFF'S OBJECTIONS THERETO (DOC. # 37 );OVERRULING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM JUDGMENT UNDER FED. R. CIV. P. 60(b) (DOC. # 35 ); JUDGMENT TO ENTER IN FAVOR OF DEFENDANT AND AGAINST PLAINTIFF; CASE TO REMAIN TERMINATED ON DOCKET.. Signed by Judge Walter H Rice on 9/8/2015. (ead)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
March 30, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 36 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - It is respectfully recommended that Plaintiff's Motion for Relief from Judgment 35 be DENIED. Objections to R&R due by 4/16/2015. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R Merz on 3/30/2015. (kpf1)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
March 2, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 34 CLERK'S JUDGMENT with Notice of Disposal. Signed on 3/2/2015. (srb1)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
December 1, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 31 SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS ON MOTION FOR RECUSAL - It is therefore again respectfully recommended that the Motion to Recuse be DENIED. Objections to R&R due by 12/18/2014. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R Merz on 12/1/2014. (kpf1)(This document has been sent by the Clerks Office by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
November 19, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 30 RECOMMITTAL ORDER ON MOTION FOR RECUSAL. Signed by Judge Walter H Rice on 11/19/2014. (srb1)
November 7, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 28 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS ON MOTION FOR RECUSAL - Plaintiff's Motion for Recusal of District Judge Walter Rice (Doc. No. 22) should be denied. Objections to R&R due by 11/24/2014. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R Merz on 11/7/2014. (kpf1)
September 2, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER QUASHING SERVICE OF ALIAS PROCESS AND PROOF OF SERVICE. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R Merz on 9/2/2014. (kpf1)
August 6, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 10 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - The Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Warren Easterling should be DENIED. Objections to R&R due by 8/25/2014. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R Merz on 8/6/2014. (kpf1)
July 29, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER QUASHING SERVICE OF PROCESS - This case is before the Court upon the filing of Acknowledgements of Service (Doc. Nos. 3, 6). That service is QUASHED because Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(c)(2) expressly provides that service may not be made by a party.The second Acknowledgement is a standard "green card" proof of receipt of certified mail service signed by Ed Goble, a deputy clerk of courts for Greene County, Ohio.That service is also QUASHED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R Merz on 7/29/2014. (kpf1)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Easterling v. Crawford
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Warren Easterling
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Dale Crawford, Judge
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?