Ackles v. Commissioner of Social Security
Tammy Ackles |
Commissioner of Social Security |
3:2014cv00249 |
July 31, 2014 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
Dayton Office |
GREENE |
Sharon L Ovington |
Walter H Rice |
Disability Insurance |
42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 26 DECISION AND ENTRY - It is therefore ORDERED that: 1. The Report and Recommendations docketed on May 5, 2017 (Doc. # 25 ) is ADOPTED in full; 2. Counsel's Motion For Allowance Of Attorney Fees (Doc. # 16 ) is GRANTED, and Plaintiffs counsel is a warded $17,025.00 in attorney fees pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 406(b); 3. Plaintiffs counsel is directed to remit to Plaintiff the total amount of attorney fees, $4,000.00, counsel has received under the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d); and 4. The case remains terminated on the Court's docket. Signed by Judge Walter H. Rice on 5/24/2017. (pb) |
Filing 25 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: 22 Motion For Allowance Of Attorney Fees filed by Plaintiff's counsel be GRANTED, and the Commissioner be directed to pay Plaintiff's attorney fees pursuant in the total amount of $17,025.00; Plaintiff 9;s counsel be ordered to refund directly to Plaintiff the $4,000.00 previously awarded him under the Equal Access to Justice Act; and the case remain terminated on the docket of this Court. Objections to R&R due by 5/19/2017. Signed by Magistrate Judge Sharon L. Ovington on 5-5-17. (slo1) |
Filing 13 It is therefore ORDERED that: The Report and Recommendations filed on April 1, 2014 (Doc. # 12 ) is ADOPTED in full; The Commissioner's non-disability finding dated March 13, 2013 is VACATED; No finding is made regarding whether Plaintiff Tammy Ackles is under a "disability" within the meaning of the Social Security Act; This matter is REMANDED to the Social Security Administration pursuant to Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. §405(g) for further proceedings consistent with the Report and Recommendations, and this Decision and Entry; and The case is terminated on the docket of this Court.. Signed by Judge Walter H Rice on 5-6-2015. (ead) |
Filing 12 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS that the Commissioner's non-disability decision dated March 13, 2013 be vacated; no finding be made about whether Plaintiff was under a "disability"; this case be remanded to the Commissioner and the Administrative Law Judge under Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. §405(g); and the case be terminated. Objections to R&R due by 5/4/2015. Signed by Chief Magistrate Judge Sharon L. Ovington on 4-17-15. (mcm1) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Ackles v. Commissioner of Social Security | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Tammy Ackles | |
Represented By: | Gary Marc Blumenthal |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security | |
Represented By: | John J. Stark |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.