Parillo et al v. New Werner Co. et a.
| Dave J Parillo and Teresa K Parillo |
| New Werner Co, New Werner Holding Co (DE), LLC, Lowe's Companies, Inc. and Lowe's Home Centers, Inc. |
| 3:2014cv00369 |
| October 28, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Dayton Office |
| CLARK |
| Thomas M Rose |
| Property Damage Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
108
ENTRY AND ORDER GRANTING MOTIONS IN LIMINE REGARDING EXPERT TESTIMONY OF DR. JERNER AND DR. BURKE. Signed by Judge Thomas M. Rose on 9-19-2017. (de)
|
|
Filing
106
ENTRY AND ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR LEAVE 87 TO RESPOND INSTANTER TO DEFENDANTS REPLY BRIEF AND GRANTING MOTION IN LIMINE 83 TO EXCLUDE LAY WITNESS OPINION TESTIMONY REGARDING MEDICAL CAUSATION AND DIAGNOSIS. Signed by Judge Thomas M. Rose on 9-18-2017. (de)
|
|
Filing
65
ORDER denying 59 Motion for Summary Judgment as moot and granting 63 Joint Motion to Drop Parties. Signed by Judge Thomas M. Rose on 1-19-2017. (de)
|
|
Filing
52
ORDER denying 47 Defendants' Motion to Compel Production of Subject Ladder. Signed by Magistrate Chief Judge Sharon L. Ovington on 2/24/16. (mcm) Modified on 2/24/2016 (mcm).
|
|
Filing
39
ENTRY AND ORDER GRANTING, IN PART, DEFENDANTS' PARTIAL MOTION TO DISMISS 33 AND DISMISSING COUNTS 1, 2, 6, AND 7 OF THE THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT 31 . Accordingly, Counts 1, 2, 6 and 7 of the Third Amended Complaint 31 are dismissed. Signed by Judge Thomas M. Rose on 7-28-2015. (de)
|
|
Filing
25
ENTRY AND ORDER OVERRULING THE PARILLOS' MOTION TO REMAND (Doc. 9 ). There is no evidence that Defendants failed to attach all copies of all process, pleadings and orders served upon Defendants as required by the removal statute. If there was a procedural failure, and the Court has not identified one, Defendants could correct it. Plaintiff's argument regarding unanimity of consent cannot be considered, but, if it were, it is without merit because there is unanimity of consent and Defendants were not required to allege unanimity of consent in its removal Notice. Signed by Judge Thomas M Rose on 12/4/14. (ep)
|
|
Filing
10
ORDER REQUIRING DEFENDANT NEW WERNER HOLDING CO (DE) LLC TO INFORM THE COURT NOT LATER THAN NOVEMBER 12, 2014, OF THE NAME AND CITIZENSHIP OF EACH MEMBER. Signed by Judge Thomas M Rose on 11/4/14. (ep)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
