LEEN v. Wright Medical Technology, Inc. et al
Vincent Leen |
Wright Medical Technology, Inc. and Wright Medical Group, Inc. |
3:2015cv00125 |
April 7, 2015 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
Dayton Office |
CHAMPAIGN |
Walter H Rice |
Tort Product Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 44 ORDER OF DISMISSAL; TERMINATION ENTRY - The Court having been advised by counsel for the parties that the above matter has been settled, IT IS ORDERED that this action is hereby DISMISSED, with prejudice as to the parties, provided that any of the parties may, upon good cause shown within 60 days, reopen the action if settlement is not consummated. Signed by Judge Walter H. Rice on 7/13/17. (pb) |
Filing 23 STIPULATED PROPOSED CONFIDENTIALITY PROTECTIVE ORDER. Signed by Judge Walter H. Rice on 3/21/16. (pb) |
Filing 19 DECISION AND ENTRY SUSTAINING IN PART AND OVERRULING IN PART DEFENDANTS' PARTIAL MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT (Doc. # 5 ) - Defendants' Partial Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint, Doc. # 5 , is SUSTAINED IN PART and OVERRULED IN PART. Plaintiff's claims of negligent wantonness (Count IV), breach of implied warranty of fitness for a particular purpose (Count VI), and unjust enrichment (Count VII) are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. The Court OVERRULES Defendants' request to strike Plaintiff's claim for punitive damages. Signed by Judge Walter H. Rice on 9/18/2015. (srb) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.