Russell v. Warden, North Central Corectional Complex
| Christopher M Russell |
| Warden, North Central Corectional Complex |
| 3:2015cv00165 |
| May 7, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Dayton Office |
| CLARK |
| Michael R. Merz |
| Walter H Rice |
| General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
59
DECISION AND ENTRY OVERRULING PETITIONER'S OBJECTION (DOC. # 52 ) TO UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S DECISION AND ORDER DENYING MOTION TO STRIKE BUT GRANTING REOPENING OF PETITIONER'S TIME TO APPEAL DENIAL OF HIS RULE 60(b) MOTION; A DOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ON APPEAL IN FORMA PAUPERIS(DOC. # 50 ) AND SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (DOC. # 57 ); OVERRULINGPETITIONER'S OBJECTIONS THERETO (DOC. # 58 ); DENYING CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY AND LEAVE TO APPEAL IN FORMA PAUPERIS; CASE TO REMAIN TERMINATED. Signed by Judge Walter H. Rice on 6/26/17. (kma)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing
57
SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - In sum, Mr. Russell's Objection is without merit and the District Court should overrule it. Objections to R&R due by 5/10/2017. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz on 4/26/2017. (kpf)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing
43
DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS (DOC. # 34 ) AND SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS (DOC. # 40 ); OVERRULING PETITIONER'S OBJECTIONS THERETO (DOCS. ## 37 , 42 ); DENYING PETITION ER'S MOTION REQUESTING RELIEF FROM JUDGMENT UNDER FED. R. CIV. P. 60(b)( 1) (DOC. # 33 ); JUDGMENT TO ENTER IN FAVOR OF RESPONDENT AND AGAINST PETITIONER; DENYING CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY AND LEAVE TO APPEAL IN FORMA PAUPER/S; CASE TO REMAIN TERMINATED. Signed by Judge Walter H. Rice on 9/26/2016. (pb)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing
40
SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS; ORDER DENYING DISCOVERY AND EXPANSION OF THE RECORD - Having reconsidered the matter in light of Russell's Objections, the Magistrate Judge remains persuaded that Russell's Motion for Relief from Jud gment (ECF No. 33) should be DENIED. Because reasonable jurists would not disagree with this conclusion, Petitioner should be denied a certificate of appealability and the Court should certify to the Sixth Circuit that any appeal would be objectivel y frivolous and therefore should not be permitted to proceed in forma pauperis. Objections to R&R due by 8/22/2016. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz on 8/4/2016. (kpf)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing
34
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS RE: 33 MOTION filed by Christopher M Russell Objections to R&R due by 7/18/2016. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz on 6/30/2016. (srb)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing
28
DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS ON MOTION TO EXPAND THE RECORD (DOC. # 25 ); OVERRULING PETITIONER'S OBJECTIONS THERETO (DOC. # 27 ), WHICH THE COURT CONSTRUES AS A MOTION TO AMEND THE JUDGMENT UNDER FED. R. CIV. P. 59(e); CASE TO REMAIN TERMINATED ON DOCKET. Signed by Judge Walter H. Rice on 3/24/16. (pb)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing
25
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS ON MOTION TO EXPAND THE RECORD - The Objections, construed as a motion to amend the judgment under Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e), should be OVERRULED and the Motion DENIED. (Objections to R&R due by 12/21/2015). Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz on 12/4/2015. (srb)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing
22
ORDER ADOPTING SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 21 Report and Recommendations,. Signed by Judge Walter H. Rice on 11/10/2015. (srb)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing
21
SECOND SUPLEMENTAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - It is again respectfully recommended that the Petition be dismissed with prejudice as barred by the statute of limitations. Because reasonable jurists would not disagree with this conclusion, Petitioner should be denied a certificate of appealability and the Court should certify to the Sixth Circuit that any appeal would be objectively frivolous and therefore should not be permitted to proceed in forma pauperis. Objections to R&R due by 11/2/2015. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz on 10/16/2015. (kpf)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing
18
SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - Upon reconsideration the Magistrate Judge again respectfully recommends the Petition be dismissed as time-barred. Because reasonable jurists would not disagree with this conclusion, Petitioner should be denie d a certificate of appealability and the Court should certify to the Sixth Circuit that any appeal would be objectively frivolous and therefore should not be permitted to proceed in forma pauperis. Objections to R&R due by 10/8/2015. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz on 9/21/2015. (kpf)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing
13
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - It is respectfully recommended that the Motion to Dismiss be granted and that the Petition be dismissed with prejudice as barred by the statute of limitations. Because reasonable jurists would not disagree with this concl usion, Petitioner should be denied a certificate of appealability and the Court should certify to the Sixth Circuit that any appeal would be objectively frivolous and therefore should not be permitted to proceed in forma pauperis. Objections to R&R due by 9/14/2015. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz on 8/27/2015. (kpf)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing
6
DECISION AND ORDER denying 2 Motion to Stay. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz on 05/21/15. (pb)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Russell v. Warden, North Central Corectional Complex | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Christopher M Russell | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Warden, North Central Corectional Complex | |
| Represented By: | M Scott Criss |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
