Saunders v. Greater Dayton Regional Transit Authority
Plaintiff: Selena R. Saunders
Defendant: Greater Dayton Regional Transit Authority
Case Number: 3:2015cv00201
Filed: June 5, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
Office: Dayton Office
County: MONTGOMERY
Presiding Judge: Michael J Newman
Referring Judge: Walter H Rice
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Jury Demanded By: Defendant
RSS RSS Track this Docket
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 29, 2016. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 29, 2016 Filing 17 DECISION AND ENTRY SUSTAINING PLAINTIFF'S UNOPPOSED MOTION TO DISMISS PURSUANT TO RULE 41 (a)(2) (DOC. #16 ); DISMISSING CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE; TERMINATION ENTRY. Signed by Judge Walter H. Rice on 6/29/16. (pb)
April 27, 2016 Filing 16 MOTION to Dismiss WITHOUT PREJUDICE by Plaintiff Selena R. Saunders. Responses due by 5/23/2016 (Carter, Julius)
April 25, 2016 Minute Entry: This civil case came before the Court for a discovery status conference on 4/25/2016 at 11:00 a.m. Attorneys Julius Carter and Matthew Roberts participated. Plaintiff's attorney represented that Plaintiff will seek to dismiss the case without prejudice within the next couple of days. Defense counsel has no objection to the requested dismissal. (dm)
February 25, 2016 Filing 15 RULE 26(f) REPORT OF EXPERT by Plaintiff Selena R. Saunders. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit REPORT, #2 Exhibit INVOICE, #3 Exhibit CV) (Carter, Julius)
February 16, 2016 Filing 14 NOTICE by Defendant Greater Dayton Regional Transit Authority Identification of Lay Witnesses (Guttman, Daniel)
January 15, 2016 Filing 13 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time New date requested 2/16/2016. for Witness Identifications by Defendant Greater Dayton Regional Transit Authority. (Guttman, Daniel)
January 15, 2016 Opinion or Order NOTATION ORDER: For good cause shown, the parties' joint motion for extension (doc. #13 ) is GRANTED. The following deadlines set forth in the Preliminary Pretrial Order (doc. 9) are extended: (1) lay witnesses shall be identified on or before 2/16/2016; (2) expert witnesses shall be disclosed on or before 2/25/2016; and (3) rebuttal experts shall be disclosed on or before 4/25/2016. All other dates set forth in the Preliminary Pretrial Order remain as previously set. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Newman on 1/15/2016. (dm)
December 30, 2015 Minute Entry: This case came before the Court for a discovery status conference by telephone on 12/30/2015 at 10:00 am. Attorneys Julius Carter and Matthew Roberts appeared and participated. (dm)
December 29, 2015 Filing 12 NOTICE by Plaintiff Selena R. Saunders RESPONSE TO NOTATION ORDER (Carter, Julius)
December 29, 2015 Minute Entry: This case came before the Court for a duly scheduled discovery status conference on 12/29/2015 at 3:00 pm. Attorney Matthew Roberts appeared on behalf of Defendant. For a second time in two weeks, Plaintiff's attorney Julius Carter failed to appear and participate in the call. An Order will issue by separate entry. (dm)
December 29, 2015 Opinion or Order NOTATION ORDER: The Court sets this case for a discovery status conference on 12/30/2015 at 10:00 am. Counsel shall call: 1-877-336-1839, enter access code 2725365, security code 123456 and wait for the Court to join the conference. Having missed two previous, duly scheduled conference calls, Plaintiff's counsel is ORDERED to advise the Court as to whether he intends to proceed with prosecution of this civil case. Plaintiff's counsel's failure to appear for the conference call on 12/30/2015 may result in issuance of an Order to Show Cause as to why this case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Newman on 12/29/2015. (dm)
December 29, 2015 NOTICE: Telephone Conference set for 12/30/2015 at 10:00 AM in Teleconference before Magistrate Judge Michael J. Newman. Counsel shall call: 1-877-336-1839, enter access code 2725365, security code 123456, and wait for the Court to join the conference. (dm)
December 15, 2015 Minute Entry: This case came before the Court for a discovery status conference on 12/15/2015 at 11:00 am. Attorney Matthew Roberts appeared on behalf of Defendant. Plaintiff's attorney Julius Carter did not appear and participate in the call. The Court sets this case for a discovery status conference on 12/29/2015 at 3:00 pm. Counsel shall call: 1-877-336-1839, enter access code 2725365, security code 123456 and wait for the Court to join the conference. (dm)
September 22, 2015 Filing 11 ANSWER to #10 Amended Complaint filed by Greater Dayton Regional Transit Authority. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - 2011 Charge, #2 Exhibit B - EEOC Determination, #3 Exhibit C - 2015 Charge, #4 Exhibit D - Collective Bargaining Agreement, #5 Exhibit E - Arbitrator's Opinion and Award, #6 Exhibit F - GDRTA's Post-Hearing Brief, #7 Exhibit G - Union's Post-Hearing Brief) (Guttman, Daniel)
September 10, 2015 Opinion or Order NOTATION ORDER: This civil case was referred to the undersigned for all pretrial matters until expiration of the discovery period. The undersigned sets this case for discovery status conferences by telephone on 12/15/2015 at 11:00 am and 4/25/2016 at 11:00 am. Counsel shall call: 1-877-336-1839, enter access code 2725365, security code 123456, and wait for the Court to join the conference. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Newman on 8/21/2015. (dm)
September 8, 2015 Filing 10 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Greater Dayton Regional Transit Authority, filed by Selena R. Saunders. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2) (Carter, Julius)
August 19, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 9 PRELIMINARY PRETRIAL ORDER: CASE IS REFERRED TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE MICHAEL J. NEWMAN - (Required disclosures under Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1) due by 9/21/2015., Settlement demand by Plaintiff upon Defendant to bemade by Ptf to Dft- 11/15/2015; Response by Dft- 12/7/2015., Written notification to Coourt re: contingent consent or refusal to Magistrate Judge for trial purposes only due by close of business 9/18/2015., Motions directed to pleadings due by 11/16/2015., Amended Pleadings due by 11/23/2015., Lay Witness due by 1/15/2016. Plaintiff Primary Expert due by 1/18/2016., Plaintiff Rebuttal Expert due by 3/18/2016., Defendant Primary Expert due by 1/18/2016., Defendant Rebuttal Expert due by 3/18/2016. Discovery due by Tuesday 5/24/2016., Status Conference set for Tuesday 5/31/2016 05:00 PM by Teleconference before Judge Walter H Rice., Motions not directed to pleadings due by 6/24/2016., Cut-off date for all other pretrial motions. ie., motionsin limine, motions for a view, etc. due by Tuesday 9/27/2016., Proposed Final Pretrial Order due by Tuesday 10/4/2016., Exhibit Submission for Trial or Hearing due by Friday 10/7/2016., Final Pretrial Conference set for Tuesday 10/11/2016 05:00 PM by Teleconference before Judge Walter H Rice., Deadline for submitting proposed jury instructions (To include verdict forms and interrogatories) to the Court in both hard copy and diskette form and original copies of depositions, with designations, that counsel intend to use at trial:At least 10 days prior to trial., Deadline for submitting counter-designations: At least 5 days prior to trial., Jury Trial set for 10/24/2016 09:00 AM in Courtroom 1 - Dayton before Judge Walter H Rice.) - Law Clerk assigned to case: Lisa Woodward. Signed by Judge Walter H Rice on 8/19/2015. (srb)
July 28, 2015 Minute Entry for Preliminary Pretrial Telephone Conference held on 7/27/2015.(Scheduling Entry to be filed shortly.) (Court Reporter Debra Futrell.) (jdf)
July 23, 2015 Filing 8 RULE 26(f) REPORT of Parties by Defendant Greater Dayton Regional Transit Authority. (Roberts, Matthew)
July 2, 2015 Filing 7 ANSWER to #2 Complaint filed by Greater Dayton Regional Transit Authority. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - EEOC Charge, #2 Exhibit B - Collective Bargaining Agreement, #3 Exhibit C - Arbitrator's Opinion and Award, #4 Exhibit D - GDRTA's Post-Hearing Brief, #5 Exhibit E - Union's Post-Hearing Brief) (Guttman, Daniel)
June 23, 2015 NOTICE OF TELEPHONE CONFERENCE :Preliminary Pretrial Telephone Conference set for 7/27/2015 at 4:15 PM before Judge Walter H Rice. Prior to the pretrial conference counsel must comply with the MANDATORY DISCLOSURE RULES of Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1) and the MANDATORY, pre-preliminary pretrial conference between counsel, required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f). NOTE...the format for the Rule 26(f) conference between counsel and the Report to the court has been altered. This new form is available on line and MUST be utilized in this case. The Report must be filed 7 DAYS PRIOR TO THE CONFERENCE. In all cases with class action allegations, the parties shall include in their Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f) report proposed deadlines for completing discovery relevant to those allegations and for filing a motion to certify a class, and a proposed date for class action determination. Pretrial procedures and forms can be found at our website at www.ohsd.uscourts.gov. Should more attorneys be actively involved than those listed on the Court's docket, please notify the Courtroom Deputy, Cindy Fugate, at 937-512-1501, immediately, to include the additional attorneys in the Preliminary Pretrial Telephone Conference. If you wish a number other than your office number called, please advise 24 hours preceding the conference. (jdf)
June 22, 2015 ...NOTICE, If case is to be referred, it will be Magistrate Judge Michael J. Newman (pb)
June 9, 2015 Filing 6 NOTICE by Defendant Greater Dayton Regional Transit Authority of Stipulated Extension of Time to Move or Plead (Guttman, Daniel)
June 9, 2015 Filing 5 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time New date requested 7/3/2015. by Defendant Greater Dayton Regional Transit Authority. (Guttman, Daniel)
June 8, 2015 Filing 4 NOTICE by Defendant Greater Dayton Regional Transit Authority of Certificate of Filing (Guttman, Daniel)
June 5, 2015 Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Defendant Greater Dayton Regional Transit Authority. (agm)
June 5, 2015 Filing 2 (Copy of) COMPLAINT with JURY DEMAND (Originally filed in the Montgomery County CPC on 5/6/2015 under case number 2015-cv-2467 against Greater Dayton Regional Transit Authority, filed by Selena R. Saunders. (agm) Modified on 6/22/2015 (pb).
June 5, 2015 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Montgomery County Court of Common Pleas, case number 2015 CV 02467, filed by Greater Dayton Regional Transit Authority. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Civil Cover Sheet, #5 Supplemental Civil Cover Sheet) (agm)
June 5, 2015 Filing fee: $ 400, receipt number 200COL037681 (agm)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Saunders v. Greater Dayton Regional Transit Authority
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Greater Dayton Regional Transit Authority
Represented By: Matthew Roberts
Represented By: Margaret K. Reid
Represented By: Daniel Jay Guttman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Selena R. Saunders
Represented By: Julius L Carter
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?