Jones, Jr. et al v. Praxair, Inc. et al
| Freddie Jones, Jr. and Donnell C. Holmes, Sr. |
| Praxair, Inc. and Anthony W. Crossley |
| 3:2015cv00277 |
| August 11, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Dayton Office |
| SHELBY |
| Walter H Rice |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
43
ORDER OF DISMISSAL: TERMINATION ENTRY- The Court having been advised by counsel for the parties that the above matter has been settled, IT IS ORDERED that this action is hereby DISMISSED, with prejudice as to the parties, provided that any of the par ties may, upon good cause shown within 60 days, reopen the action if settlement is not consummated. Parties intending to preserve this Court's jurisdiction to enforce the settlement should be aware of Kokkonen v. Guardian L{fe Ins. Co. of Americ a, 114 S.Ct. 1673 ( 1994), and incorporate appropriate language in any substituted judgment entry. The Court will retain jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the settlement between the parties, if necessary.IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge Walter H. Rice on 1/18/17. (kma)
|
|
Filing
36
DECISION AND ENTRY SUSTAINING DEFENDANTS PRAXAIR, INC.'S AND ANTHONY W. CROSSLEY'S OBJECTIONS TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS (DOC. # 28 ); ADOPTING IN PART AND REJECTING IN PART UNITED STATES CHIEF MAGISTRATE JUDGE& #039;S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS (DOC. # 27 ); SUSTAINING MOTION OF DEFENDANTS PRAXAIR, INC. AND ANTHONY W. CROSSLEY PURSUANT TO RULES 12(b) AND 12(f) TO DISMISS THE COMPLAINT IN PART AND TO STRIKE CERTAIN PARAGRAPHS THEREFROM (DOC. # 6 ) - Mo re specifically, Claim Two, asserting claims of negligence and negligence per se against Defendant Praxair, is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Claim Four, asserting a claim for punitive damages against both Defendants, is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE to renewal as a possible remedy, if warranted. Paragraphs 6, 7 and 9 are STRICKEN from the Complaint. Signed by Judge Walter H. Rice on 6/27/2016. (srb)
|
|
Filing
27
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - 1) Defendants' Motion to Dismiss In Part 6 be granted, in part, and Plaintiffs' Fourth Claim be dismissed without prejudice subject to renewal, if warranted, as the remedy of punitive damages; 2) Defendants� 39; Motion To Dismiss In Part 6 be otherwise denied; and 3) Defendants' Motion To Strike In Part Certain Paragraphs Therefrom 6 be granted as to paragraphs six and seven of the complaint, and be otherwise denied. Objections to R&R due by 3/24/2016. Signed by Chief Magistrate Judge Sharon L. Ovington on 3/7/16. (mcm)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
