Industrial Transport Services, LLC v. Gemini Transport, LLC
Industrial Transport Services, LLC |
Gemini Transport, LLC and Ale Dukic |
3:2015cv00299 |
August 31, 2015 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
Dayton Office |
MONTGOMERY |
Thomas M. Rose |
Motor Vehicle |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 51 ORDER OF DISMISSAL; TERMINATION ENTRY: The Court, having been advised that the above-captioned matter has been settled, IT IS ORDERED that this action is hereby DISMISSED, with prejudice as to all parties, provided that any of the parties may, upon good cause shown within forty-five (45) days, reopen the action if settlement is not consummated. Within forty-five (45) days, the parties may move to substitute this Order and Entry with a proposed dismissal entry agreed upon by the parties. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Newman on 7/6/2017. (dm) |
Filing 50 ENTRY AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTIONS TO CONSOLIDATE CASES. (3:17-cv-98, ECF 10, 3:15-cv-299, ECF 27 ). CASES 3:17-CV-086 AND 3:17-CV-098 ARE CONSOLIDATED AND 3:17-CV-098 IS TRANSFERRED FROM THE DOCKET OF JUDGE RICE TO THE DOCKET OF JUDGE ROSE. THE MOTION IS MOOT AS REGARDS TO 3:15-CV-299 granting 27 Motion to Consolidate Cases. Signed by Judge Thomas M. Rose on 6/29/17. Signed by Judge Walter H. Rice on 6/29/2017 (pb) |
Filing 16 AGREED PROTECTIVE ORDER. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Newman on 1/28/16. (pb) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.