Johnson v. Robert W. Hutcheson et al
| James Richard Johnson |
| Robert W. Hutcheson, LG, David L Pendry, Monika Talkington and Anu Shamar |
| 3:2015cv00320 |
| September 9, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Dayton Office |
| MONTGOMERY |
| Sharon L. Ovington |
| Walter H Rice |
| Other Fraud |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
4
DECISION AND ENTRY - ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS (Doc. # 3 )is ADOPTED in full; 2. Plaintiffs complaint is DISMISSED with prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1915(e)(2); 3. The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. §1915(a)(3) that Pla intiffs appeal, if any, would not be taken in good faith; and, 4. The case is terminated on the docket of this Court. Signed by Judge Walter H. Rice on 10/21/15. (pb)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing
3
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: 1) Plaintiff's complaint be DISMISSED with prejudice; 2) The Court certify that Plaintiff's appeal, if any, would not be taken in good faith; and 3) The case be terminated on the docket of this Court. Objections to R&R due by 10/16/2015. Signed by Chief Magistrate Judge Sharon L. Ovington on 9/28/15. (cf)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
