Marks v. Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff: Mary C. Marks
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Case Number: 3:2015cv00339
Filed: September 24, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
Office: Dayton Office
County: MONTGOMERY
Presiding Judge: Michael J. Newman
Presiding Judge: Walter H. Rice
Nature of Suit: Disability Insurance
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 1, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 20 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. The Report and Recommendation (doc. 19) is ADOPTED in full; 2. Plaintiffs unopposed motion for an EAJA fee award (doc. 18 ) 1s GRANTED; 3. Plaintiff is AWARDED $14,000.00 in EAJA fees; and 4. The case remains TERMINATED on the docket of this Court. Signed by Judge Walter H. Rice on 9/1/17. (pb)
August 16, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 19 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION THAT: (1) PLAINTIFFS COUNSELS UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR APPROVAL OF ATTORNEYS FEES (DOC. 18) BE GRANTED; (2) FEES, PURSUANT TO 42 U.S.C. § 406(b), IN THE AMOUNT OF $14,000.00 BE AWARDED; AND (3) THIS CASE REMAIN TERMINATED ON THE COURTS DOCKET re 18 MOTION for Attorney Fees filed by Mary C. Marks. Objections to R&R due by 8/30/2017. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Newman on 8/16/17. (pb)
August 19, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 14 DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONSOF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE (DOC. # 12 ) IN THEIR ENTIRETY; PLAINTIFF'S OBJECTIONS TO SAID JUDICIAL FILING (DOC. # 13 ) ARE OVERRULED; JUDGMENT TO BE ENTERED IN FAVOR OF PLAINTIFF AND A GAINST DEFENDANT CAROLYN W. COLVIN, ACTING COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, REVERSING COMMISSIONER'S DECISION THAT PLAINTIFF WAS NOT DISABLED AND, THEREFORE, NOT ENTITLED TO BENEFITS UNDER THE SOCIAL SECURITY ACT, AND REMANDING CAPTIONED CAUSE TO THE COMMISSIONER, PURSUANT TO THE FOURTH SENTENCE OF 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), FOR FURTHER PROCEEDINGS CONSISTENT WITH THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS; TERMINATION ENTRY. Signed by Judge Walter H. Rice on 8/19/16. (pb)
July 11, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 12 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION THAT: (1) THE ALJS NON-DISABILITY FINDING BE FOUND UNSUPPORTED BY SUBSTANTIAL EVIDENCE, AND REVERSED; (2) THIS MATTER BE REMANDED TO THE COMMISSIONER UNDER THE FOURTH SENTENCE OF 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) FOR PROCEEDINGS CONSISTENT WITH THIS OPINION; AND (3) THIS CASE BE CLOSED re 2 Complaint filed by Mary C. Marks. Objections to R&R due by 7/28/2016. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Newman on 7/11/16. (pb)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Marks v. Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Mary C. Marks
Represented By: Gary Marc Blumenthal
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Represented By: John J. Stark
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?