Strange v. Brennan
| Brett H Strange |
| Megan J Brennan |
| 3:2015cv00377 |
| October 13, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Dayton Office |
| MONTGOMERY |
| Walter H. Rice |
| Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
45
DECISION AND ENTRY DISMISSING COMPLAINT WITHOUT PREJUDICE; TERMINATION ENTRY- Pursuant to this Court's Decision and Entry of May 10, 2018, Doc. # 44 , thecaptioned case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for want of prosecution andhereby terminated upon the docket of the United States District Court for theSouthern District of Ohio, Western Division at Dayton. Signed by Judge Walter H. Rice on 12/10/18. (kma)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing
39
AGREED PROTECTIVE ORDER. Signed by Judge Walter H. Rice on 4/10/18. (kma)
|
|
Filing
35
DECISION AND ENTRY OVERRULING PLAINTIFF BRETT STRANGE'S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF COURT'S JULY 19, 2017, ENTRY (DOC. # 32 ); PLAINTIFF'S CLAIM FOUR WILL STILL PROCEED ONLY AS AN ALLEGED DISCRETE ACT OF DISCRIMINATION- For the foreg oing reasons, Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration, Doc. #32, isOVERRULED. Plaintiff's claim of hostile work environment, and Claims Two, Three and Five as discrete discriminatory acts, remain dismissed with prejudice. Plaintiff's Claim Four may proceed to further discovery only as a discrete discriminatory action undertaken by Kellner.Signed by Judge Walter H. Rice on 10/19/17. (kma)
|
|
Filing
31
DECISION AND ENTRY SUSTAINING IN PART AND OVERRULING IN PART MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF DEFENDANT MEGAN J. BRENNAN, POSTMASTER GENERAL, UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE (DOC. # 21 ) AND OVERRULING MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF PLAINTIFF BRETT STRANG E (DOC. # 17 ); PLAINITFF'S CLAIMS TWO, THREE AND FIVE AGAINST DEFENDANTARE DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; PLAINTIFF'S CLAIM FOUR SHALL PROCEED ONLY AS AN ALLEGED DISCRETE ACT OF DISCRIMINATION; JUDGMENT SHALL ULTIMATELY ENTER IN FAVOR OF DEFENDANT AND AGAINST PLAINTIFF ON CLAIMS TWO, THREE AND FIVE. Signed by Judge Walter H. Rice on 7/19/17. (pb)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Strange v. Brennan | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Brett H Strange | |
| Represented By: | Julius L Carter |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Megan J Brennan | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
