Flores v. US Attorney General

Flores v. US Attorney General

Plaintiff:	Eric Flores
Defendant:	US Attorney General
Case Number:	3:2015cv00381
Filed:	October 16, 2015
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
Office:	Dayton Office
County:	MONTGOMERY
Presiding Judge:	Michael R. Merz
Presiding Judge:	Walter H. Rice
Nature of Suit:	Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
November 6, 2015	Filing 5 DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS (DOC. # 3 ); DISMISSING COMPLAINT (DOC. # 2 ) WITH PREJUDICE; JUDGMENT TO BE ENTERED IN FAVOR OF RESPONDENTS AND AGAINST PETITIONER; TERMINATION ENTRY. Signed by Judge Walter H. Rice on 11/6/15. (pb)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
October 19, 2015	Filing 3 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - The claims made by Plaintiff in this action are materially identical to those made in the case adjudicated by Judges Newman and Rice. They are therefore barred by res judicata. It is accordingly respectfully recommended that this case be dismissed with prejudice. Objections to R&R due by 11/5/2015. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz on 10/19/2015. (kpf)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)

Date Filed

Document Text

November 6, 2015

Filing 5 DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS (DOC. # 3 ); DISMISSING COMPLAINT (DOC. # 2 ) WITH PREJUDICE; JUDGMENT TO BE ENTERED IN FAVOR OF RESPONDENTS AND AGAINST PETITIONER; TERMINATION ENTRY. Signed by Judge Walter H. Rice on 11/6/15. (pb)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)

October 19, 2015

Filing 3 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - The claims made by Plaintiff in this action are materially identical to those made in the case adjudicated by Judges Newman and Rice. They are therefore barred by res judicata. It is accordingly respectfully recommended that this case be dismissed with prejudice. Objections to R&R due by 11/5/2015. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz on 10/19/2015. (kpf)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Flores v. US Attorney General
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Eric Flores
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: US Attorney General
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?