Moon v. Jones, Sheriff et al
Plaintiff: Darnell Wesly Moon
Defendant: Richard K. Jones, Sheriff and Dennis Adams
Case Number: 3:2015cv00424
Filed: November 30, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
Office: Dayton Office
County: MONTGOMERY
Presiding Judge: Michael J. Newman
Presiding Judge: Thomas M. Rose
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 19, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 34 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - No objections have been filed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), and the time for filing objections has expired. The Court hereby ORDERS that the Report and Recommendation 32 is ADOPTED in full; Plaintiff' s motion for voluntary dismissal 31 is GRANTED; Plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, Defendants' motion to dismiss 24 is DENIED AS MOOT and this case is TERMINATED on the Court's docket. Signed by Judge Thomas M. Rose on 12-19-2017. (de)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
November 29, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 32 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION THAT: (1) PRO SE PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL (DOC. 31 ) BE GRANTED; (2) THIS CASE BE DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; (3) DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS (DOC. 24 ) BE DENIED AS MOOT; AND (4) THIS CASE BE TERMINATED ON THE COURTS DOCKET. Objections to R&R due by 12/13/2017. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Newman on 11/28/17. (kma)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
June 19, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 21 ORDER AND ENTRY: (1) GRANTING PRO SE PLAINTIFFS SECOND MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT (DOC. 20); (2) GRANTING PRO SEPLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR LEAVE FROM THE CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE REQUIREMENT (DOC. 19); AND (3) DIRECTING THE CLERK TO SEPAR ATELY FILE PRO SE PLAINTIFFS FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT (DOC. 20-1)REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION THAT: (1) DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS BE DENIED AS MOOT (DOC. 12); AND (2) PRO SE PLAINTIFFS FIRST MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT (DOC. 14) BE DENIED AS MOOT. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Newman on 6/19/2017. (dm)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Moon v. Jones, Sheriff et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Darnell Wesly Moon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Richard K. Jones, Sheriff
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Dennis Adams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?