Jones v. Commissioner of Social Security

Justia Dockets & Filings Sixth Circuit Ohio Southern District Jones v. Commissioner of Social Security

Jones v. Commissioner of Social Security

Plaintiff:	Sarah E Jones
Defendant:	Commissioner of Social Security
Case Number:	3:2015cv00428
Filed:	December 2, 2015
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
Office:	Dayton Office
County:	CLARK
Presiding Judge:	Michael J. Newman
Presiding Judge:	Thomas M. Rose
Nature of Suit:	Supplemental Security Income
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 206
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
March 31, 2017	Filing 16 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - The Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendations 13 in its entirety. The Commissioner's non-disability finding is hereby VACATED. Plaintiff's applications for Disability Insurance Benefits and Supplemental Security Income filed on January 1, 2008 is REMANDED to the Social Security Administration for further proceedings consistent with the Report and Recommendation. The instant case is TERMINATED on the docket of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio, Western District at Dayton. Signed by Judge Thomas M. Rose on 3-31-2017. (de)
February 10, 2017	Filing 13 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION THAT: (1) THE ALJS NON-DISABILITY FINDING BE FOUND UNSUPPORTED BY SUBSTANTIAL EVIDENCE, AND REVERSED; (2) THIS MATTER BE REMANDED TO THE COMMISSIONER UNDER THE FOURTH SENTENCE OF 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) FOR PROCEEDINGS CONSISTENT WITH THIS OPINION; AND (3) THIS CASE BE CLOSED re 2 Objections to R&R due by 2/24/2017. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Newman on 2/10/17. (kma)

Date Filed

Document Text

March 31, 2017

Filing 16 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - The Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendations 13 in its entirety. The Commissioner's non-disability finding is hereby VACATED. Plaintiff's applications for Disability Insurance Benefits and Supplemental Security Income filed on January 1, 2008 is REMANDED to the Social Security Administration for further proceedings consistent with the Report and Recommendation. The instant case is TERMINATED on the docket of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio, Western District at Dayton. Signed by Judge Thomas M. Rose on 3-31-2017. (de)

February 10, 2017

Filing 13 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION THAT: (1) THE ALJS NON-DISABILITY FINDING BE FOUND UNSUPPORTED BY SUBSTANTIAL EVIDENCE, AND REVERSED; (2) THIS MATTER BE REMANDED TO THE COMMISSIONER UNDER THE FOURTH SENTENCE OF 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) FOR PROCEEDINGS CONSISTENT WITH THIS OPINION; AND (3) THIS CASE BE CLOSED re 2 Objections to R&R due by 2/24/2017. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Newman on 2/10/17. (kma)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Jones v. Commissioner of Social Security
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Sarah E Jones
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Represented By:	John J. Stark
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?