Beal v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Felicia D. Beal |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| 3:2015cv00429 |
| December 2, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Dayton Office |
| CLARK |
| Sharon L. Ovington |
| Walter H. Rice |
| Disability Insurance |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 205 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
16
DECISION AND ENTRY - Accordingly. the Court hereby ORDERS that: I. The parties Joint Stipulation And Assignment For An Award Of Attorney Fees Under The Equal Access To Justice Act (Doc. # 15 ) is ACCEPTED, and the Commissioner shall pay Plaintiffs attorney fees, costs, and expenses in the total amount of $5,l00.00; 2. Counsel for the parties shall verify, within thirty days of this Decision and Order, whether or not Plaintiff owes a pre-existing debt to the United States that is subject to offset. If no such pre-existing debt exists, the Commissioner shall direct that this EAJA award be made payable to Plaintiff's attorney; and 3. The case remains terminated on the docket of this Court.granting 15 Motion for Attorney Fees. Signed by Judge Walter H. Rice on 5/3/17. (pb)
|
|
Filing
13
DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING IN THEIR ENTIRETY REPORTAND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATEJUDGE (DOC. # 12 ); JUDGMENT TO BE ENTERED IN FAVOR OF PLAINTIFF AND AGAINST DEFENDANT NANCY A. BERRYHILL, ACTING COMMISSIONER OF THE SOCIAL SECURITY A DMINISTRATION, REVERSING THE DEFENDANT COMMISSIONER'S DECISION THAT PLAINTIFF WAS NOT DISABLED AND, THEREFORE, NOT ENTITLED TO BENEFITS UNDER THE SOCIAL SECURITY ACT, AND REMANDING THE CAPTIONED CAUSE TO THE DEFENDANT COMMISSIONER, PURSUANT TO THE FOURTH SENTENCE OF 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), FOR FURTHER ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDINGS CONSISTENT WITH THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS; TERMINATION ENTRY. Signed by Judge Walter H. Rice on 2/14/17. (pb)
|
|
Filing
12
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: 1) The Commissioner's non-disability finding be vacated; 2) No finding be made as to whether Plaintiff Felicia Beal was under a disability; 3) This case be remanded to the Commissioner and the Administrative Law Judge for further consideration consistent with this Report; and 4)The case be terminated on the docket of this Court. Objections to R&R due by 1/31/2017. Signed by Chief Magistrate Judge Sharon L. Ovington on 1-17-16. (mcm)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Beal v. Commissioner of Social Security | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Felicia D. Beal | |
| Represented By: | Clifford Michael Farrell |
| Represented By: | Jason M Mauch |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security | |
| Represented By: | John J. Stark |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
