Access Center for Independent Living et al v. WP Glimcher Inc. et al
| Access Center for Independent Living, Mark Theobald, Sylvia Jane Cook, John Kenneth Dixon, Melody Ann Burba and National Federation of the Blind of Ohio |
| WP Glimcher Inc., Dayton Mall II, LLC, Dayton Mall Venture, LLC, Macy's Retail Holdings, Inc., Elder Ohio I Delaware Business Trust, Bon-Ton Department Stores, Inc. and Sears Roebuck and Co |
| 3:2015cv00444 |
| December 15, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Dayton Office |
| MONTGOMERY |
| Walter H. Rice |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
58
ENTRY AND ORDER GRANTING MALL DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 53 AND TERMINATING CASE. Signed by Judge Thomas M. Rose on 6-8-2018. (de)
|
|
Filing
41
ORDER - The Court VACATES the First Amended Scheduling Order (doc. 34 ). The parties shall jointly file a Proposed Second Amended Scheduling Order on or before February 13, 2017. All discovery outstanding as of today shall be produced within (7) days. Second mediation on January 30, 2017 at 9:00 a.m. at the Federal Building, 200 West Second Street, Room 505, Dayton, Ohio, 45402. Signed by Judge Thomas M. Rose on 1/12/17. (ep)
|
|
Filing
20
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER. Signed by Judge Walter H. Rice on 6/24/16. (pb)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
