DeHart v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Donald L. DeHart |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| 3:2015cv00446 |
| December 17, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Dayton Office |
| MONTGOMERY |
| Sharon L. Ovington |
| Walter H. Rice |
| Supplemental Security Income |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
20
DECISION AND ENTRY - IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT: 1. The Parties' Joint Stipulation for an Award of Attorney Fees under the EAJA (Doc. # 19 ) is accepted and the Commissioner shall pay Plaintiffs attorney fees, costs, and expenses in the tota l amount of $3,800; 2. Counsel for the parties shall verify, within thirty days of this Decision and Entry, whether or not Plaintiff owes a pre-ex isting debt to the United States subject to offset. If no such pre-existing debt exists, Defendant shall pay the EAJA award directly to Plaintiffs counsel pursuant to the EAJA assignment signed by Plaintiff; and 3. The case remains terminated on the docket of this Court. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge Walter H. Rice on 3/17/2017. (srb)
|
|
Filing
17
DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES CHIEF MAGISTRATE JUDGE (DOC. # 14 ) IN THEIR ENTIRETY; OBJECTIONS OF PLAINTIFF DONALD DEHART (DOC. # 15 ) TO SAID JUDICIAL FILING ARE OVERRULED; JUDGMENT TO BE ENTERED IN FAVOR O F PLAINTIFF AND AGAINST DEFENDANT CAROLYN W.COLVIN, ACTING COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,REVERSING THE COMMISSIONER'S DECISION THAT PLAINTIFF WAS NOT DISABLED AND, THEREFORE, NOT ENTITLED TO BENEFITS UNDER THE SOCIAL SECURITY ACT, AND REMANDING CAPTIONED CAUSE TO THE COMMISSIONER, PURSUANT TO THE FOURTH SENTENCE OF 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), FOR FURTHER PROCEEDINGS CONSISTENT WITH THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS; TERMINATION ENTRY. Signed by Judge Walter H. Rice on 12/29/16. (kma)
|
|
Filing
14
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: The Commissioner's non-disability finding be vacated; no finding be made as to whether Plaintiff Donald Dehart was under a "disability" within the meaning of the Social Security Act; this matter be REMANDED to the Social Security Administration for further consideration consistent with this Report and Recommendations, and any decision adopting this Report and Recommendations; and the case be terminated on the Courts docket. Objections to R&R due by 12/2/2016. Signed by Chief Magistrate Judge Sharon L. Ovington on 11/15/2016. (lek)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: DeHart v. Commissioner of Social Security | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Donald L. DeHart | |
| Represented By: | Gary Marc Blumenthal |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security | |
| Represented By: | John J. Stark |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
